Noncooperative Distributed Social Welfare Optimization with EV Charging Response

This paper presents a novel non-cooperative strategic game-theoretic framework to model electric vehicle (EV) aggregators (such as fast-charging stations and aggregated building charging infrastructures) and enable their participation in integrated economic dispatch and demand response, as known as social welfare optimization. Each EV aggregator acts as a selfish and independent player with focus on only its own benefits. A special type of non-cooperative strategic game, called potential game, is applied to model the interaction between all palyers. Spatial adaptive play (SAP) is applied to for the players to learn and react in the proposed game, with guaranteed convergence to a Nash equilibrium (NE) which is also a global optimizer to the social welfare optimization problem. Simulations on a IS-bus IEEE network have been conducted to validate the framework. Results match expected outcomes and dynamics of the proposed EV charzina response 2ame.

[1]  Joong-Rin Shin,et al.  A particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch with nonsmooth cost functions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Wenxin Liu,et al.  Distributed Online Optimal Energy Management for Smart Grids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  Pooya Soltantabar Annual Energy Outlook , 2015 .

[4]  H. Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions , 1999 .

[5]  Francois Bouffard,et al.  Electric Vehicle Aggregator/System Operator Coordination for Charging Scheduling and Services Procurement , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Advanced Demand Side Management for the Future Smart Grid Using Mechanism Design , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Peter Palensky,et al.  Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[8]  Jin Ye,et al.  Robust Identification of EV Charging Profiles , 2018, 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC).

[9]  Jiming Chen,et al.  A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[10]  R. Harley,et al.  Potential-game theoretical formulation of optimal power flow problems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[11]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[12]  Mushfiqur R. Sarker,et al.  Optimal Participation of an Electric Vehicle Aggregator in Day-Ahead Energy and Reserve Markets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[15]  N. Amjady,et al.  Nonconvex Economic Dispatch With AC Constraints by a New Real Coded Genetic Algorithm , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Santiago Grijalva,et al.  Game-Theoretic Formulation of Power Dispatch With Guaranteed Convergence and Prioritized BestResponse , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[17]  Filipe Joel Soares,et al.  Integration of Electric Vehicles in the Electric Power System , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Fully Distributed Social Welfare Optimization With Line Flow Constraint Consideration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[19]  Gabriel Kron,et al.  Tensorial Analysis of Integrated Transmission Systems; Part II. Off-Nominal Turn Ratios [includes discussion] , 1952, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[20]  Wolfgang Ketter,et al.  Smart Charging of Electric Vehicles using Reinforcement Learning , 2013, AAAI Workshop: Trading Agent Design and Analysis.