Adaptation of Aeroelastic Reduced-Order Models and Application to an F-16 Configuration

The proper orthogonal decomposition method has been shown to produce accurate reduced-order models for the aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft configurations at fixed flight conditions. However, changes in the Mach number or angle of attack often necessitate the reconstruction of the reduced-order model to maintain accuracy, which destroys the sought-after computational efficiency. Straightforward approaches for reduced-order model adaptation-such as the global proper orthogonal decomposition method and the direct interpolation of the proper orthogonal decomposition basis vectors-that have been attempted in the past have been shown to lead to inaccurate proper orthogonal decomposition bases in the transonic flight regime. Alternatively, a new reduced-order model adaptation scheme is described in this paper and evaluated for changes in the freestream Mach number and angle of attack. This scheme interpolates the subspace angles between two proper orthogonal decomposition subspaces, then generates a new proper orthogonal decomposition basis through an orthogonal transformation based on the interpolated subspace angles. The resulting computational methodology is applied to a complete F-16 configuration in various airstreams. The predicted aeroelastic frequencies and damping coefficients are compared with counterparts obtained from full-order nonlinear aeroelastic simulations and flight test data. Good correlations are observed, including in the transonic regime. The obtained computational results reveal a significant potential of the adapted reduced-order model computational technology for accurate, near-real-time, aeroelastic predictions.

[1]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Mach Number Influence on Reduced-Order Models of Inviscid Potential Flows in Turbomachinery , 2002 .

[2]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  CFD-Based Aeroelastic Eigensolver for the Subsonic, Transonic, and Supersonic Regimes , 2001 .

[3]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  A New Look at Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2003, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[4]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[5]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Frequency-Domain Karhunen -Loeve Method and Its Application to Linear Dynamic Systems , 1998 .

[6]  Gregory W. Brown,et al.  Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid–structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter , 2003 .

[7]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency-domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique , 1999 .

[8]  C. Farhat,et al.  Interpolation Method for Adapting Reduced-Order Models and Application to Aeroelasticity , 2008 .

[9]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes , 2002 .

[10]  L. Peterson,et al.  Improved exponential time series approximation of unsteady aerodynamic operators , 1988 .

[11]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Aeroelastic Dynamic Analysis of a Full F-16 Configuration for Various Flight Conditions , 2003 .

[12]  P. Tallec,et al.  Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity , 1998 .

[13]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[14]  Stefan Volkwein,et al.  Galerkin Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Methods for a General Equation in Fluid Dynamics , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[15]  Mark N. Glauser,et al.  Towards Practical Flow Sensing and Control via POD and LSE Based Low-Dimensional Tools (Keynote Paper) , 2002 .

[16]  Paul G. A. Cizmas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition of Turbine Rotor-Stator Interaction , 2003 .

[17]  J. Peraire,et al.  Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2002 .

[18]  Her Mann Tsai,et al.  Calculation of Wing Flutter by a Coupled Fluid-Structure Method , 2001 .

[19]  Michael C. Romanowski Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using Karhunen-Loeve eigenmodes , 1996 .

[20]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[21]  Michel Lesoinne,et al.  Parameter Adaptation of Reduced Order Models for Three-Dimensional Flutter Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  Ryan F. Schmit,et al.  Improvements in low dimensional tools for flow-structure interaction problems: Using global POD , 2003 .

[23]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Reduced-order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration , 2006 .

[24]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Transonic Aeroelasticity Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Reduced-Order Models , 2001 .

[25]  Holt Ashley,et al.  Piston Theory-A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician , 1956 .

[26]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces , 1971, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[27]  C. Farhat,et al.  Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: Three‐field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution , 1995 .

[28]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A linearized method for the frequency analysis of three-dimensional fluid/structure interaction problems in all flow regimes , 2001 .

[29]  Thuan Lieu Adaptation of reduced order models for applications in aeroelasticity , 2004 .

[30]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery , 2003 .