Cognitive and vision loss affects the topography of the attentional visual field.

PURPOSE The attentional visual field (AVF), which describes a person's ability to divide attention and extract visual information from the visual field (VF) within a glance, has been shown to be a good predictor of driving performance. Despite this, very little is known about the shape of the AVF and the factors that affect it. The purposes of this study were to describe the AVF in a large sample of older drivers and identify demographic, cognitive, and vision factors associated with AVF performance and shape. METHODS Registered drivers between 67 and 87 years of age, residing in Greater Salisbury, Maryland, were recruited to participate in the study. Participants underwent a battery of visual and cognitive assessments and completed various questionnaires for demographics, medical history, and history of depression. The AVF was assessed using a divided-attention protocol within the central 20 degrees radius along the four principal meridians. The shape of the AVF was classified as either symmetric or one of two asymmetric shape profiles. RESULTS Symmetrically shaped AVFs were found in just 34% of participants. AVF performance was significantly better along the horizontal (15.3 degrees ) than the vertical (11.3 degrees ) meridian (P < 0.05). After adjusting for AVF area, we found that poorer cognitive and vision performance was associated with a symmetric AVF shape. Overall AVF extent was predicted by vision and cognitive measures as well as various demographic factors. CONCLUSIONS Good vision and cognitive ability appear to be associated with having an asymmetric as opposed to a symmetric AVF shape profile.

[1]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Cognitive Deficits in Depression and Functional Specificity of Regional Brain Activity , 2007, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[2]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors , 2004, Vision Research.

[3]  Ian L. Bailey,et al.  Task Complexity and Visual Acuity in Senile Macular Degeneration , 1981 .

[4]  M Mackeben,et al.  The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  D. Roenker,et al.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  S. Leat,et al.  Visual impairment and the useful field of vision , 2006, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[8]  Gayla M. Cissell,et al.  Can High‐Risk Older Drivers Be Identified Through Performance‐Based Measures in a Department of Motor Vehicles Setting? , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  Alain Muzet,et al.  Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver’s useful visual field , 2004, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli‐Robson chart , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Tasks: Relationship to Visual Function in Older Adults , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[15]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  D. Roth,et al.  Relation of Useful Field of View and other Screening Tests to on-Road Driving Performance , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  The effect of auditory and visual distracters on the useful field of view: implications for the driving task. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  C. Savage,et al.  The neural network basis for abnormalities of attention and executive function in major depressive disorder: implications for application of the medical disease model to psychiatric disorders. , 2002, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[19]  V. Richardson,et al.  An Analysis of an Older Driver Evaluation Program , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  J. Dartigues,et al.  Depressive Symptoms, Major Depressive Episode and Cognition in the Elderly: The Three-City Study , 2007, Neuroepidemiology.

[21]  C. Johnson,et al.  Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[23]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[24]  M Mackeben,et al.  Sustained focal attention and peripheral letter recognition. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[25]  Karen Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  D. Roth,et al.  Cumulative Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Useful Field of View and Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current and Future Implications , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  P. Bennett,et al.  Effects of aging on the useful field of view. , 2000, Experimental aging research.

[28]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[29]  D Whitaker,et al.  Visual acuity changes throughout adulthood in normal, healthy eyes: seeing beyond 6/6. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  Karlene K Ball,et al.  The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[31]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Testing the field of vision , 1982 .

[32]  B. Munoz,et al.  Association of Visual Field Loss and Mobility Performance in Older Adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[33]  C. Owsley,et al.  Association Between Visual Attention and Mobility in Older Adults , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[34]  Beatriz Muñoz,et al.  Measures of visual function and their association with driving modification in older adults. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Predictors of Automobile Crashes and Moving Violations among Elderly Drivers , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[36]  Jason Brandt,et al.  Validation of the brief test of attention in patients with huntington's disease and amnesia , 1996 .

[37]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent , 1996, Vision Research.

[38]  J. Wood,et al.  Elderly Drivers and Simulated Visual Impairment , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[39]  E. Peli,et al.  On-Road Driving with Moderate Visual Field Loss , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[40]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual localization: age and practice. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  C. Owsley,et al.  Relationship between visual sensitivity and target localization in older adults , 1995, Vision Research.

[42]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Neural correlates of the visual vertical meridian asymmetry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[43]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.