Bridging the gap between science and decision making

All decisions, whether they are personal, public, or business-related, are based on the decision maker’s beliefs and values. Science can and should help decision makers by shaping their beliefs. Unfortunately, science is not easily accessible to decision makers, and scientists often do not understand decision makers’ information needs. This article presents a framework for bridging the gap between science and decision making and illustrates it with two examples. The first example is a personal health decision. It shows how a formal representation of the beliefs and values can reflect scientific inputs by a physician to combine with the values held by the decision maker to inform a medical choice. The second example is a public policy decision about managing a potential environmental hazard. It illustrates how controversial beliefs can be reflected as uncertainties and informed by science to make better decisions. Both examples use decision analysis to bridge science and decisions. The conclusions suggest that this can be a helpful process that requires skills in both science and decision making.

[1]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bringing values and deliberation to science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[3]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[4]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Managing Potential Health Risks from Electric Powerlines: A Decision Analysis Caught in Controversy , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  The Effects of Electromagnetic Fields from Transmission Lines on Public Fears and Property Values , 1996 .

[6]  H. Brachinger,et al.  Decision analysis , 1997 .

[7]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Extensions of the Subjective Expected Utility Model , 2012 .

[8]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Applying the science of communication to the communication of science , 2011 .

[9]  R. Luce Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches , 2000 .

[10]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  The Efficacy of Different Methods for Informing the Public About the Range Dependency of Magnetic Fields from High Voltage Power Lines , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[12]  Joseph E. Aldy,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World , 2003 .

[13]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of Probabilities: The State of the Art , 1977 .

[14]  M. J. Quadrel,et al.  Risk perception and communication , 2008 .

[15]  N. Wertheimer,et al.  Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. , 1979, American journal of epidemiology.