Level of service of pedestrian facilities: Modelling human comfort perception in the evaluation of pedestrian behaviour patterns

Abstract The paper presents a new methodology for evaluating the quality of operation of pedestrian facilities: the methodology is based on the individual level of comfort perceived by each pedestrian that moves in the area. At each time instant, each pedestrian perceives a comfort level which is a function of the space they feel currently available and of his required space. The required space depends on the subject’s walking direction as well as on physical and psychological factors. The available space depends on the current positions of pedestrians. The proposed methodology quantifies the current discomfort due to pedestrian interactions as a continuous function of the interpersonal distances. The proposed methodology has been applied to empirical data. The experimental data are presented, discussed and compared with widely accepted level of service assessment methods.

[1]  C. Richards,et al.  The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. , 2005, Motor control.

[2]  R. D. Middlemist,et al.  Personal space invasions in the lavatory: suggestive evidence for arousal. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  André Borrmann,et al.  A hybrid multi-scale approach for simulation of pedestrian dynamics , 2013 .

[4]  Victor J. Blue,et al.  Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways , 2001 .

[5]  K. Kitazawa,et al.  Pedestrian Vision and Collision Avoidance Behavior: Investigation of the Information Process Space of Pedestrians Using an Eye Tracker , 2010 .

[6]  R. Gifford Projected Interpersonal Distance and Orientation Choices: Personality, Sex, and Social Situation , 1982 .

[7]  M. Baldassare Human Spatial Behavior , 1978 .

[8]  Virginia P Sisiopiku,et al.  Application of Level-of-Service Methods for Evaluation of Operations at Pedestrian Facilities , 2007 .

[9]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Personal space claims as a function of interpersonal threat: The mediating role of need for control , 1984 .

[10]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Personal space : the behavioral basis of design , 1970 .

[11]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[12]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Microscopic simulation of pedestrians in accessibility evaluation , 2004 .

[13]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[14]  E. Hall The Silent Language , 1959 .

[15]  F Jaskiewicz,et al.  PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE BASED ON TRIP QUALITY , 2000 .

[16]  Elvezia Maria Cepolina,et al.  Pedestrian level of service: the impact of social groups on pedestrian flow characteristics , 2017 .

[17]  Yao Xiao,et al.  A pedestrian flow model considering the impact of local density: Voronoi diagram based heuristics approach , 2016 .

[18]  Siuming Lo,et al.  Microscopic modeling of pedestrian movement behavior: Interacting with visual attractors in the environment , 2014 .

[19]  Leslie A. Hayduk,et al.  The shape of personal space: An experimental investigation. , 1981 .

[20]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  State-of-the-art crowd motion simulation models , 2013 .