Estimation of in-situ mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments from well logging

Abstract Taking Well SH7 in South China Sea and Well Mount Elbert in Alaska North Slope permafrost as examples, mechanical properties of gas-hydrate-bearing sediments (GHBS) in ocean and permafrost were estimated based on the method used in conventional oil and gas reservoirs with log data, and the results were compared with other tests or calculations. The correlations between mechanical parameters and log velocities in conventional oil and gas industry can obtain reasonable strength parameters of oceanic GHBS, such as cohesion, internal frictional angle, tensile strength and shear strength. However, the estimations of shale content of oceanic GHBS, internal frictional angle of permafrost GHBS, elastic parameters such as Young's modulus and bulk modulus of oceanic and permafrost GHBS have big errors. In the future, more efforts should be given to build suitable relations between mechanical parameters and velocities or more accurate correlations between mechanical parameters and hydrate saturation. Thus, with the aid of velocities and hydrate saturations from well logging, the mechanical properties of GHBS can be more accurately evaluated.

[1]  G. Coates,et al.  Mechanical Properties Program Using Borehole Analysis And Mohr's Circle , 1981 .

[2]  J. Rutqvist,et al.  Geomechanical response of permafrost-associated hydrate deposits to depressurization-induced gas production , 2009 .

[3]  Tae Sup Yun,et al.  Hydrate-Bearing Sediments from the Krishna-Godavari Basin: Physical Characterization, Pressure Core Testing, and Scaled Production Monitoring , 2010 .

[4]  William J. Winters,et al.  Properties of samples containing natural gas hydrate from the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC Mallik 2L-38 gas hydrate research well, determined using Gas Hydrate And Sediment Test Laboratory Instrument (GHASTLI) , 1999 .

[5]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Sonic waveform attenuation in gas hydrate-bearing sediments from the Mallik 2L-38 research well, Mackenzie Delta, Canada , 2002 .

[6]  Timothy S. Collett,et al.  In-situ gas hydrate hydrate saturation estimated from various well logs at the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope , 2011 .

[7]  Weiguo Liu,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments , 2011 .

[8]  Richard E. Lewis,et al.  Downhole well log and core montages from the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope , 2011 .

[9]  B. Anderson,et al.  Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Overview of scientific and technical program , 2011 .

[10]  Huang Chao.  Development in Researching on Sidewall Stability with Logging Data , 2004 .

[11]  Francis Albarède,et al.  Upwelling of deep mantle material through a plate window: Evidence from the geochemistry of Italian basaltic volcanics , 2002 .

[12]  G. Narsilio,et al.  Instrumented pressure testing chamber for characterizing sediment cores recovered at in situ hydrostatic pressure , 2006 .

[13]  W. Waite,et al.  Physical properties of pressurized sediment from hydrate ridge , 2006 .

[14]  G. Bohrmann,et al.  The Impact of Porous Microstructures of Gas Hydrates On Their Macroscopic Properties , 2004 .

[15]  Keith K. Millheim,et al.  The Planning and Drilling of Hot Ice #1 - Gas Hydrate Exploration Well in the Alaskan Arctic , 2005 .

[16]  J. Castagna,et al.  Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks , 1985 .

[17]  C. Tsouris,et al.  Physical Properties of Gas Hydrates: A Review , 2010 .