Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort.

[1]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. , 1995, Circulation.

[2]  William Wijns,et al.  Relation Between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis , 1995 .

[3]  P. Camici,et al.  Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  P. Hartigan,et al.  Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1994, Circulation.

[5]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Correlation of pharmacological 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses. , 1994, Circulation.

[6]  A Bol,et al.  Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. , 1994, Circulation.

[7]  W. Paulus,et al.  Transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[9]  P. Serruys,et al.  Which angiographic variable best describes functional status 6 months after successful single-vessel coronary balloon angioplasty? , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  P D Verdouw,et al.  In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[11]  S E Nissen,et al.  Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  L. Tenerz,et al.  Initial experiences with a miniaturized pressure transducer during coronary angioplasty. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[13]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.

[14]  S. Kalbfleisch,et al.  Automated quantitation of indexes of coronary lesion complexity. Comparison between patients with stable and unstable angina. , 1990, Circulation.

[15]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  H. Drexler,et al.  Flow-dependent coronary artery dilatation in humans. , 1989, Circulation.

[17]  I C Cooper,et al.  Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method. , 1988, American heart journal.

[18]  E J Topol,et al.  Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  J. Reiber,et al.  Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? , 1987, Circulation.

[20]  N. Mullani,et al.  Relation between geometric dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  R. Wilson,et al.  Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. , 1987, Circulation.

[22]  M. LeFree,et al.  Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.

[23]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  Videodensitometric determination of minimum coronary artery luminal diameter before and after angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  E. Bates,et al.  Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  R. Wilson,et al.  Intracoronary papaverine: an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the coronary circulation in conscious humans. , 1986, Circulation.

[26]  P. Serruys,et al.  Papaverine: the ideal coronary vasodilator for investigating coronary flow reserve? A study of timing, magnitude, reproducibility, and safety of the coronary hyperemic response after intracoronary papaverine. , 1986, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[27]  K. Gould,et al.  Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  C. J. Kooijman,et al.  Quantitative angiography of the left anterior descending coronary artery: correlations with pressure gradient and results of exercise thallium scintigraphy. , 1985, Circulation.

[29]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[30]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  C. White,et al.  The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses. , 1984, Circulation.

[32]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  E L Bolson,et al.  Experimental Validation of Quantitative Coronary Arteriography for Determining Pressure-Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenosis , 1982, Circulation.

[34]  K. Gallagher,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of controlled degrees of coronary artery stenosis in short-term and long-term studies in dogs. , 1977, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[35]  N R Cholvin,et al.  Pressure Drop across Artificially Induced Stenoses in the Femoral Arteries of Dogs , 1975, Circulation research.

[36]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.