Integrating solar PV (photovoltaics) in utility system operations: Analytical framework and Arizona case study

A systematic framework is proposed to estimate the impact on operating costs due to uncertainty and variability in renewable resources. The framework quantifies the integration costs associated with sub-hourly variability and uncertainty as well as day-ahead forecasting errors in solar PV (photovoltaics) power. A case study illustrates how changes in system operations may affect these costs for a utility in the southwestern United States (Arizona Public Service Company). We conduct an extensive sensitivity analysis under different assumptions about balancing reserves, system flexibility, fuel prices, and forecasting errors. We find that high solar PV penetrations may lead to operational challenges, particularly during low-load and high solar periods. Increased system flexibility is essential for minimizing integration costs and maintaining reliability. In a set of sensitivity cases where such flexibility is provided, in part, by flexible operations of nuclear power plants, the estimated integration costs vary between $1.0 and $4.4/MWh-PV for a PV penetration level of 17%. The integration costs are primarily due to higher needs for hour-ahead balancing reserves to address the increased sub-hourly variability and uncertainty in the PV resource.

[1]  Marco Cometto,et al.  Nuclear Energy and Renewables - System Effects in Low-Carbon Electricity Systems , 2012 .

[2]  Fabian Mueller,et al.  Exploration of the integration of renewable resources into California's electric system using the Holistic Grid Resource Integration and Deployment (HiGRID) tool , 2013 .

[3]  Jian Ma,et al.  Operational Impacts of Wind Generation on California Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Jian Ma,et al.  Impact of wind and solar generation on the California ISO's intra-hour balancing needs , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  Zhi Zhou,et al.  Integrating Solar PV in Utility System Operations , 2014 .

[6]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Integration costs revisited – An economic framework for wind and solar variability ☆ , 2015 .

[7]  Debra Lew,et al.  Creating the Dataset for the Western Wind and Solar Integration Study (U.S.A.) , 2008 .

[8]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  Application of probabilistic wind power forecasting in electricity markets , 2013 .

[9]  Michael Milligan,et al.  Integration of Variable Generation, Cost-Causation, and Integration Costs , 2011 .

[10]  V. Miranda,et al.  Wind power forecasting uncertainty and unit commitment , 2011 .

[11]  Luis Marroyo,et al.  From irradiance to output power fluctuations: the PV plant as a low pass filter , 2011 .

[12]  Ana Estanqueiro,et al.  Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power: Final summary report, IEA WIND Task 25, Phase three 2012-2014 , 2012 .

[13]  Geothermal Energy Western Wind and Solar Integration Study , 2010 .

[14]  Vladimiro Miranda,et al.  Demand Dispatch and Probabilistic Wind Power Forecasting in Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch: A Case Study of Illinois , 2013 .

[15]  N. Jaleeli,et al.  NERC's new control performance standards , 1999 .

[16]  Maureen Hand,et al.  Envisioning a renewable electricity future for the United States , 2014 .

[17]  Deepak Rajan,et al.  IBM Research Report Minimum Up/Down Polytopes of the Unit Commitment Problem with Start-Up Costs , 2005 .

[18]  A. Mills,et al.  Implications of Wide-Area Geographic Diversity for Short- Term Variability of Solar Power , 2010 .