Curbing the Spread of Misinformation: Insights, Innovations, and Interpretations from the Misinformation Solutions Forum

Although many people now have access to more accumulated information than has ever been the case in human existence, we also now face a moment when the proliferation of misinformation, or false or inaccurate information, poses major challenges. In response to these challenges and to build collaboration across disciplines and expertise and a more effective community of learning and practice, the Rita Allen Foundation partnered with RTI International and the Aspen Institute along with Craig Newmark Philanthropies, Democracy Fund, and Burroughs Wellcome Fund to hold the Misinformation Solutions Forum in October 2018 at the Aspen Institute in Washington, DC. This forum brought together academic researchers, technology professionals, data scientists, journalists, educators, community leaders, funders and a set of graduate student fellows to explore promising ideas for curbing the spread of misinformation. We issued an open call for ideas to be featured in the forum that sought interventions focused on reducing behaviors that lead to the spread of misinformation or encouraging behaviors that can lead to the minimization of its influence. Interventions with technological, educational, and/or community-based components were encouraged, as were projects involving science communication, public health and diverse populations. A panel of expert judges assessed submissions through a blind review process; judges included representatives from the Rita Allen Foundation, as well as external institutions such as the Democracy Fund, the National Institutes of Health, the Poynter Institute, First Draft, and academic institutions. Authors developed the essays presented here based on both original submissions and the iterative collaboration process that ensued.

[1]  W. Mcguire,et al.  The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[2]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach , 1982 .

[3]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[4]  K. Pezdek,et al.  Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect , 1998 .

[5]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[6]  P. Goldie How we think of others' emotions , 1999 .

[7]  Luis von Ahn Games with a Purpose , 2006, Computer.

[8]  M. Tiggemann,et al.  Impact of interactive school-based media literacy lessons for reducing internalization of media ideals in young adolescent girls and boys. , 2006, The International journal of eating disorders.

[9]  S. Sundar The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[10]  H Peltola,et al.  Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[11]  Brian A Primack,et al.  Quantifying media literacy: development, reliability, and validity of a new measure , 2009, Educational media international.

[12]  Patricia Kowalski,et al.  The Effect of Refuting Misconceptions in the Introductory Psychology Class , 2009 .

[13]  T. Singer,et al.  The Social Neuroscience of Empathy , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[15]  G. Gauchat Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere , 2012 .

[16]  Jesse Gainer Critical Media Literacy in Middle School: Exploring the Politics of Representation , 2010 .

[17]  J. Ladd Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters , 2011 .

[18]  R. Link-Gelles,et al.  Missed Opportunities: A National Survey of Obstetricians About Attitudes on Maternal and Infant Immunization , 2012, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[19]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[20]  Alan Borning,et al.  Supporting reflective public thought with considerit , 2012, CSCW.

[21]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Science, New Media, and the Public , 2013, Science.

[22]  S. Mamede,et al.  Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[23]  M. Garry,et al.  The effect of nonprobative photographs on truthiness persists over time. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Scott Counts,et al.  Microblog credibility perceptions: comparing the USA and China , 2013, CSCW.

[25]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  A Risky Science Communication Environment for Vaccines , 2013, Science.

[26]  Caitlin K. Martin,et al.  The Digital Youth Network: Cultivating Digital Media Citizenship in Urban Communities , 2014 .

[27]  Huaye Li,et al.  Social impacts in social media: An examination of perceived truthfulness and sharing of information , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial , 2014, Pediatrics.

[29]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Debiasing Decisions , 2015 .

[30]  Christopher E. Clarke,et al.  The Power of a Picture: Overcoming Scientific Misinformation by Communicating Weight‐of‐Evidence Information with Visual Exemplars , 2015 .

[31]  J. Landercasper,et al.  Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[32]  Samantha R. Paige,et al.  eHealth Literacy and Web 2.0 Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Baby Boomers and Older Adults , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media , 2015 .

[34]  Smita C. Banerjee,et al.  A Theory-Grounded Measure of Adolescents' Response to a Media Literacy Intervention. , 2015, The journal of media literacy education.

[35]  Douglas J. Rupert,et al.  Correction of Overstatement and Omission in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising , 2015 .

[36]  Ethan Porter,et al.  The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence , 2018, Political Behavior.

[37]  Denise Harrison,et al.  Using YouTube to Disseminate Effective Vaccination Pain Treatment for Babies , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  Emily A. Thorson Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation , 2016 .

[39]  Emily A. Thorson,et al.  The persistence and peril of misinformation: Defining what truth means and deciphering how human brains verify information are some of the challenges to battling widespread falsehoods , 2017 .

[40]  Naeemul Hassan,et al.  Diving Deep into Clickbaits: Who Use Them to What Extents in Which Topics with What Effects? , 2017, ASONAM.

[41]  Can Cancer Truths Be Told? Challenges for Medical Journalism. , 2017, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[42]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence , 2017, PloS one.

[43]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  What arguments on vaccinations run through YouTube videos in Italy? A content analysis , 2017, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[44]  Matthew L. Jensen,et al.  Mitigation of Cognitive Bias with a Serious Game: Two Experiments Testing Feedback Timing and Source , 2017, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[45]  Amy X. Zhang,et al.  Making Sense of Group Chat through Collaborative Tagging and Summarization , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[46]  Jennifer Kavanagh,et al.  Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life , 2018 .

[47]  A. Lavin,et al.  The Prenatal Visit , 2009, Pediatrics.

[48]  P. Aufderheide Media Literacy: From a Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy , 2018, MEDIA LITERACY in the INFORMATION AGE.

[49]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[50]  Taylor W. Brown,et al.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  David R. Karger,et al.  A Structured Response to Misinformation: Defining and Annotating Credibility Indicators in News Articles , 2018, WWW.

[52]  Laura Sheble,et al.  Misinformation and Mass Audiences , 2018 .

[53]  J. Leask,et al.  Vaccine decision-making begins in pregnancy: Correlation between vaccine concerns, intentions and maternal vaccination with subsequent childhood vaccine uptake. , 2017, Vaccine.