If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice

If-conditionals are a highly valuable resource in academic discourses, whether spoken or written, as they can be used to hypothesize, hedge, manage interaction with the addressee, and promote or on the contrary circumscribe the scope of research claims. This article analyses how if-conditionals are brought into play in three genres of medical discourse: research articles, conference presentations, and editorials. These corpus- and genre-based usages are contrasted with what is predicted in the theory on conditionals and in the explanations learners are likely to have met. Our results indicate that if-conditionals are used, both formally and functionally speaking, in very specific ways in the highly focussed, purposeful disciplinary genres. Previous exposure to and training in the use of this common syntactic pattern does not always prepare learners for this reality of discourse practice. A more genre-sensitive approach to the teaching of syntax in the EAP classroom is therefore advocated.

[1]  Shirley Carter-Thomas,et al.  Syntactic differences in oral and written scientific discourse: the role of information structure , 2001 .

[2]  Ken Hyland,et al.  What do they mean? Questions in academic writing , 2002 .

[3]  Renaat Declerck,et al.  Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[4]  K. Knorr-Cetina The Manufacture of Knowledge , 1981 .

[5]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse , 1994 .

[6]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[7]  J. Haiman Conditionals are topics , 1978 .

[8]  D. Biber,et al.  Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .

[9]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  Then in conditional constructions , 1997 .

[10]  Eija Ventola,et al.  The language of conferencing , 2002 .

[11]  Minna Vihla Medical Writing: Modality in Focus , 1999 .

[12]  Diana E. Adams Smith,et al.  Medical Discourse: Aspects of Author's Comment. , 1984 .

[13]  D. Lewis Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities , 1976 .

[14]  K. Hyland,et al.  Hedging in scientific research articles , 1998 .

[15]  Gibson Ferguson,et al.  If you pop over there: a corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse , 2001 .

[16]  K. Nwogu The medical research paper: Structure and functions , 1997 .

[17]  Eve Sweetser From Etymology To Pragmatics , 1990 .

[18]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[19]  B. Comrie,et al.  On Conditionals: CONDITIONALS: A TYPOLOGY , 1986 .

[20]  R. Dirven,et al.  Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality , 1997 .

[21]  R. Dirven,et al.  On conditionals again , 1997 .

[22]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  On Conditionals: CONDITIONALS IN DISCOURSE: A TEXT-BASED STUDY FROM ENGLISH , 1986 .

[23]  Cecilia E. Ford Speaking conditionally: some contexts forif-clauses in conversation , 1997 .

[24]  Shirley Carter-Thomas,et al.  Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy: Manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting , 2005 .

[25]  María Horsella,et al.  Aspects of scientific discourse: Conditional argumentation , 1992 .

[26]  Shirley Carter-Thomas The 'iffiness' of medical research articles A comparison of English if and French si , 2007 .

[27]  Roberta Facchinetti Conditional constructions in Modern English legal texts , 2001 .