Dynamics and Potential Impact of the Immune Response to Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Recent mathematical models have been developed to study the dynamics of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) under imatinib treatment. None of these models incorporates the anti-leukemia immune response. Recent experimental data show that imatinib treatment may promote the development of anti-leukemia immune responses as patients enter remission. Using these experimental data we develop a mathematical model to gain insights into the dynamics and potential impact of the resulting anti-leukemia immune response on CML. We model the immune response using a system of delay differential equations, where the delay term accounts for the duration of cell division. The mathematical model suggests that anti-leukemia T cell responses may play a critical role in maintaining CML patients in remission under imatinib therapy. Furthermore, it proposes a novel concept of an “optimal load zone” for leukemic cells in which the anti-leukemia immune response is most effective. Imatinib therapy may drive leukemic cell populations to enter and fall below this optimal load zone too rapidly to sustain the anti-leukemia T cell response. As a potential therapeutic strategy, the model shows that vaccination approaches in combination with imatinib therapy may optimally sustain the anti-leukemia T cell response to potentially eradicate residual leukemic cells for a durable cure of CML. The approach presented in this paper accounts for the role of the anti-leukemia specific immune response in the dynamics of CML. By combining experimental data and mathematical models, we demonstrate that persistence of anti-leukemia T cells even at low levels seems to prevent the leukemia from relapsing (for at least 50 months). As a consequence, we hypothesize that anti-leukemia T cell responses may help maintain remission under imatinib therapy. The mathematical model together with the new experimental data imply that there may be a feasible, low-risk, clinical approach to enhancing the effects of imatinib treatment.

[1]  Dominik Wodarz,et al.  Drug resistance in cancer: principles of emergence and prevention. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Cuenca,et al.  Imatinib mesylate (STI-571) enhances antigen-presenting cell function and overcomes tumor-induced CD4+ T-cell tolerance. , 2005, Blood.

[3]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Different Dynamics of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Responses During and After Acute Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[4]  J. B. Chatterjea,et al.  Chronic myelogenous leukaemia , 1973, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[5]  Holden T Maecker,et al.  Development and dynamics of robust T-cell responses to CML under imatinib treatment. , 2008, Blood.

[6]  H. Gschaidmeier,et al.  Hematologic and cytogenetic remission by STI571 (Glivec) in a patient relapsing with accelerated phase CML after second allogeneic stem cell transplantation , 2001, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[7]  R. Gale,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1992, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Molecular Responses in Patients with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase Treated with Imatinib Mesylate , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  E. Warren,et al.  The graft versus leukemia response after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. , 2003, Blood reviews.

[10]  P. Klenerman,et al.  Low level viral persistence after infection with LCMV: a quantitative insight through numerical bifurcation analysis. , 2001, Mathematical biosciences.

[11]  J. Rowe Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia with cytokines: effect on duration of neutropenia and response to infections. , 1998, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[12]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Dynamics of chronic myeloid leukaemia , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Models of CD8+ responses: 1. What is the antigen-independent proliferation program. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  A. Kiani,et al.  T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia reactions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation , 2005, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[15]  B. Löwenberg Minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Craddock,et al.  Imatinib mesylate (STI571) in the treatment of relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. , 2002, Blood.

[17]  T. Whiteside,et al.  Immune suppression in cancer: effects on immune cells, mechanisms and future therapeutic intervention. , 2006, Seminars in cancer biology.

[18]  Doron Levy,et al.  Post-transplantation dynamics of the immune response to chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  Serban Nacu,et al.  Down-Regulation of the Interferon Signaling Pathway in T Lymphocytes from Patients with Metastatic Melanoma , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[21]  C. Janeway Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease , 1996 .

[22]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Dynamic modeling of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia: functional insights and clinical implications , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[23]  B. Druker,et al.  Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressors (795 articles) , 2004 .

[24]  F. M. Thomas,et al.  Selective tyrosine kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate for the treatment of autoimmune arthritis. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  F. Andreoni,et al.  The achievement of durable complete cytogenetic remission in late chronic and accelerated phase patients with CML treated with Imatinib mesylate predicts for prolonged response at 6 years. , 2006, Blood cells, molecules & diseases.

[26]  Richard J. Jones,et al.  Treatment options for chronic myeloid leukemia: imatinib versus interferon versus allogeneic transplant , 2004, Current opinion in oncology.