On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton Yo

Abstract The overall aim of this paper is to investigate impoliteness in a particular on-line polylogal setting – YouTube postings (c. 13,000 words) triggered by the ‘Obama Reggaeton’ video, which was released during the 2008 US democratic primaries. This is done through integration of quantitative/qualitative analytic tools and of (im)politeness1 and (im)politeness 2 approaches. A two-prong experimental study is used in order to examine impoliteness realisation and interpretation in the corpus. Findings reveal clear patterns in the realisation of impoliteness strategies, including a preference for on-record impoliteness saliently oriented towards attacking the positive face needs of one's on-line co-participants. In this respect, findings also call for a refinement of existing taxonomies of impoliteness. Regarding the interpretation of impoliteness, the analysis reveals considerable overlap between ‘lay’ (impoliteness1) and ‘analyst’ (impoliteness2) assessments. The former, in addition, are found to relate principally to norms of public discourse associated with civility.

[1]  Stephanie Schnurr,et al.  Politeness, Humor and Gender in the Workplace: Negotiating Norms and Identifying Contestation , 2005 .

[2]  Sofia A. Koutlaki Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: tæ'arof in Persian , 2002 .

[3]  Naomi Geyer,et al.  Discourse politeness in Japanese conversation : some implications for a universal theory of politeness , 2004 .

[4]  Ian Hutchby Participants' orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction , 2008 .

[5]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Slouching Toward the Ordinary: Current Trends in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004, New Media Soc..

[6]  Manfred Kienpointner,et al.  Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances , 1997 .

[7]  Michael Haugh,et al.  The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative , 2007 .

[8]  Derek Bousfield,et al.  Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges , 2007 .

[9]  R. Arundale Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness , 2006 .

[10]  Patricia Bou-Franch,et al.  Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[12]  J. Angouri,et al.  “You Have No Idea What You are Talking About!” From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora , 2010 .

[13]  R. Lakoff The limits of politeness: therapeutic and courtroom discourse , 1989 .

[14]  Helen Spencer-Oatey,et al.  Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations , 2002 .

[15]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[16]  Miriam A. Locher Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements In Oral Communication , 2004 .

[17]  R. Watts,et al.  Politeness in Language. Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[18]  Michael Haugh,et al.  Face in interaction , 2010 .

[19]  Derek Bousfield,et al.  Impoliteness in interaction , 2008 .

[20]  C. Xie,et al.  Politeness: Myth and truth , 2005 .

[21]  Շուշանիկ Պարոնյան,et al.  Questions and politeness , 2001 .

[22]  Juliane House,et al.  Impoliteness in Germany: Intercultural encounters in everyday and institutional talk , 2010 .

[23]  Holly R. Cashman Impoliteness in children's interactions in a Spanish/English bilingual community of practice , 2006 .

[24]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. , 1996 .

[25]  Michel Marcoccia On-line polylogues: conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups , 2004 .

[26]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication , 2002 .

[27]  A. Tolson,et al.  A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube , 2010 .

[28]  N. Lorenzo-Dus Relational work in anonymous,asynchronous communication:A study of (dis)affiliation in YouTube , 2013 .

[29]  P. Brown,et al.  Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena , 1978 .

[30]  Marina Terkourafi,et al.  Beyond the micro-level in politeness research , 2005 .

[31]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[32]  Sage L. Graham,et al.  Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community , 2007 .

[33]  Y. Matsumoto Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese , 1988 .

[34]  P. Blitvich The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization , 2010 .

[35]  Gino Eelen A critique of politeness theories , 2001 .

[36]  P. Blitvich A Genre Approach to the Study of Im-politeness , 2010 .

[37]  Robyn Carston,et al.  The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication , 2009 .

[38]  J. Rees-Miller Power, severity, and context in disagreement , 2000 .

[39]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[40]  Michael Haugh When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness , 2010 .

[41]  R. Arundale Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement , 2010 .

[42]  P. Blitvich,et al.  A Genre Approach to impoliteness in a Spanish TV talk show , 2010 .

[43]  Ideals of Public Discourse , 2003 .

[44]  H. Spencer-Oatey (Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships , 2005 .

[45]  O. G. Nwoye,et al.  Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face , 1992 .

[46]  Miriam A. Locher,et al.  Politeness Theory and Relational Work , 2005 .

[47]  David W. Wright,et al.  Small group communication research of the 1970's: A synthesis and critique , 1980 .

[48]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[49]  Impoliteness: Eclecticism and Diaspora An introduction to the special edition , 2008 .

[50]  J. O’Driscoll,et al.  About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism , 1996 .

[51]  C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni,et al.  Introducing poly-logue , 2004 .

[52]  L. Lachenicht Aggravating language a study of abusive and insulting language , 1980 .

[53]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[54]  Jannis Androutsopoulos Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication , 2006 .

[55]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[56]  Sandra J. Harris,et al.  Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse , 2001 .

[57]  M. Kienpointner Impoliteness and emotional arguments , 2008 .

[58]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[59]  Juliane House Politeness in Germany: Politeness in GERMANY? , 2005 .

[60]  Shiv R. Upadhyay Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses , 2010 .

[61]  Jonathan Culpeper,et al.  Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. , 2003 .

[62]  P. Blitvich Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: The “Culture Wars” , 2009 .

[63]  V. Dijk,et al.  Opinions and ideologies in the press , 1997 .

[64]  P. Blitvich Introduction: The status-quo and quo vadis of impoliteness research , 2010 .

[65]  Jonathan Culpeper Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link , 2005 .

[66]  A. Fukada,et al.  Universal politeness theory: application to the use of Japanese honorifics , 2004 .

[67]  R. Watts Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work , 2008 .

[68]  N. Lorenzo-Dus “You're barking mad, I'm out”: Impoliteness and broadcast talk , 2009 .