Three-dimensional simulation of obstacle-mediated chemotaxis

Amoeboid cells exhibit a highly dynamic motion that can be directed by external chemical signals, through the process of chemotaxis. Here, we propose a three-dimensional model for chemotactic motion of amoeboid cells. We account for the interactions between the extracellular substances, the membrane-bound proteins, and the cytosolic components involved in the signaling pathway that originates cell motility. We show two- and three-dimensional simulations of cell migration on planar substrates, flat surfaces with obstacles, and fibrous networks. The results show that our model reproduces the main features of chemotactic amoeboid motion. Our simulations unveil a complicated interplay between the geometry of the cell’s environment and the chemoattractant dynamics that tightly regulates cell motion. The model opens new opportunities to simulate the interactions between extra- and intra-cellular compounds mediated by the matrix geometry.

[1]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[2]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Periodic migration in a physical model of cells on micropatterns. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[3]  W. Rappel,et al.  External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Alberto Aliseda,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of eukaryotic cell motility by improved force cytometry , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  C. M. Elliott,et al.  Modelling cell motility and chemotaxis with evolving surface finite elements , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  H. Meinhardt Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[7]  Robert H. Insall,et al.  Understanding eukaryotic chemotaxis: a pseudopod-centred view , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  R. Insall,et al.  Pseudopod Growth and Evolution during Cell Movement Is Controlled through SCAR/WAVE Dephosphorylation , 2012, Current Biology.

[9]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  How Cells Integrate Complex Stimuli: The Effect of Feedback from Phosphoinositides and Cell Shape on Cell Polarization and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  M. Sixt,et al.  Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing , 2008, Nature.

[11]  J. Tinevez,et al.  Role of cortical tension in bleb growth , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Hugo Casquero,et al.  NURBS-based numerical proxies for red blood cells and circulating tumor cells in microscale blood flow , 2017 .

[14]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[15]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Phase-field model of cellular migration: Three-dimensional simulations in fibrous networks , 2017 .

[16]  A. Hyman,et al.  Characterization of protein dynamics in asymmetric cell division by scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[17]  L. Sander,et al.  The role of cell contraction and adhesion in dictyostelium motility. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  Robert G. Endres,et al.  Distinct cell shapes determine accurate chemotaxis , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[20]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Navigation of Chemotactic Cells by Parallel Signaling to Pseudopod Persistence and Orientation , 2009, PloS one.

[21]  A. Coniglio,et al.  Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  John A. Mackenzie,et al.  A computational method for the coupled solution of reaction–diffusion equations on evolving domains and manifolds: Application to a model of cell migration and chemotaxis , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  M. Cates,et al.  A minimal physical model captures the shapes of crawling cells , 2015, Nature Communications.

[24]  Alex Groisman,et al.  Cellular memory in eukaryotic chemotaxis , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Computational model for amoeboid motion: Coupling membrane and cytosol dynamics. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[26]  John A. Mackenzie,et al.  Chemotaxis: A Feedback-Based Computational Model Robustly Predicts Multiple Aspects of Real Cell Behaviour , 2011, PLoS biology.

[27]  D. Taylor,et al.  Local and spatially coordinated movements in Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae during chemotaxis , 1982, Cell.

[28]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[29]  Goldstein,et al.  Traveling-Wave Chemotaxis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[30]  Xiangrong Li,et al.  SOLVING PDES IN COMPLEX GEOMETRIES: A DIFFUSE DOMAIN APPROACH. , 2009, Communications in mathematical sciences.

[31]  David Farrell,et al.  Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. , 2006, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[32]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[33]  Ken Jacobson,et al.  Actin-myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[34]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[35]  Axel Voigt,et al.  Signaling networks and cell motility: a computational approach using a phase field description , 2014, Journal of mathematical biology.

[36]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Activated Membrane Patches Guide Chemotactic Cell Motility , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Interaction of Motility, Directional Sensing, and Polarity Modules Recreates the Behaviors of Chemotaxing Cells , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[40]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[41]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues , 2009, PloS one.

[42]  P. V. Haastert A Stochastic Model for Chemotaxis Based on the Ordered Extension of Pseudopods , 2010 .

[43]  Michael Sixt,et al.  Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[44]  Klaus Kassner,et al.  Phase-field approach to three-dimensional vesicle dynamics. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Wanda Strychalski,et al.  A poroelastic immersed boundary method with applications to cell biology , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[46]  Natalie Andrew,et al.  Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Phosphoinositides and Rho proteins spatially regulate actin polymerization to initiate and maintain directed movement in a one-dimensional model of a motile cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[48]  G. Hulbert,et al.  A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier–Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method , 2000 .

[49]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Lattice light-sheet microscopy: Imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution , 2014, Science.

[50]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  Igor S. Aranson,et al.  Computational approaches to substrate-based cell motility , 2016 .

[52]  Chuan-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[53]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Quantitative analysis of G-actin transport in motile cells. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Juliet Lee,et al.  Slipping or gripping? Fluorescent speckle microscopy in fish keratocytes reveals two different mechanisms for generating a retrograde flow of actin. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[55]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[56]  H. Gómez,et al.  Computational Phase‐Field Modeling , 2017 .

[57]  William F. Loomis,et al.  RasC Plays a Role in Transduction of Temporal Gradient Information in the Cyclic-AMP Wave of Dictyostelium discoideum , 2004, Eukaryotic Cell.

[58]  W. Rappel,et al.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission , 2016, Science.

[60]  Denis Aubry,et al.  'Run-and-tumble' or 'look-and-run'? A mechanical model to explore the behavior of a migrating amoeboid cell. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[61]  J. Folgado,et al.  Computational model of mesenchymal migration in 3D under chemotaxis , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[62]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Chemoattractant-induced phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation is spatially amplified and adapts, independent of the actin cytoskeleton , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  F. J. Vermolen,et al.  A phenomenological model for chemico-mechanically induced cell shape changes during migration and cell–cell contacts , 2013, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[64]  W. Rappel,et al.  Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: threshold for directed motion. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[65]  Atul Narang,et al.  A mechanistic model for eukaryotic gradient sensing: spontaneous and induced phosphoinositide polarization. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[66]  Axel Voigt,et al.  A DIFFUSE-INTERFACE APPROACH FOR MODELING TRANSPORT, DIFFUSION AND ADSORPTION/DESORPTION OF MATERIAL QUANTITIES ON A DEFORMABLE INTERFACE. , 2009, Communications in mathematical sciences.