Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature

E-government has been recognized as a catalyst or tool for government administrative reform. Information technologies have the potential to produce cost savings, improve the quality of services, and make government policies more effective. However, some scholars and practitioners contend e-government has not delivered the promise of more efficient, effective, and democratic public administration. In fact, Heeks (2003) estimates that the failure rate of e-government projects may be as high as 85%. We argue that e-government and digital divide research have been relatively disconnected and important intersections exist between the two. These intersections may be useful to explain some of the failures in e-government projects and policies. Theoretically and practically, e-government and digital divide are intertwined and, therefore, a better understanding can be gained if scholars start analyzing them as complementary social phenomena. This paper reviews current literature in e-government and the digital divide and highlights some important similarities and differences. It also suggests preliminary implications for e-government research and practice.

[1]  Stuart Ferguson,et al.  Public Information Technology: Policy and Management Issues , 2007 .

[2]  M. Castells.  The Internet Galaxy , 2001 .

[3]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[5]  James N. Danziger.  Innovation in Innovation? , 2004 .

[6]  G. Garson.  Toward an information technology research agenda for public administration , 2003 .

[7]  S. Dawes.  Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .

[8]  John P. Robinson,et al.  NEW SOCIAL SURVEY PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2003 .

[9]  J. O'Looney.  Wiring Governments: Challenges and Possibilities for Public Managers , 2002 .

[10]  Rob Kling,et al.  Value conflicts and social choice in electronic funds transfer system developments , 1981, CSOC.

[11]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Per V. Jenster.  Firm Performance and Monitoring of Critical Success Factors in Different Strategic Contexts , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Ruby Roy Dholakia,et al.  Gender and IT in the Household: Evolving Patterns of Internet Use in the United States , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[14]  Jeimy J. Cano,et al.  Critical Reflections on Information Systems: A Systemic Approach , 2002 .

[15]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Integrating Conceptual Approaches to E-Government , 2006 .

[16]  Michelle D'auray,et al.  The Dual Challenge of Integration and Inclusion , 2003 .

[17]  Sofiane Sahraoui,et al.  E‐inclusion as a further stage of e‐government? , 2007 .

[18]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Carl J. Cuneo,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2003 .

[20]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[21]  B. Compaine.  The Digital Divide : Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? , 2001 .

[22]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will E-Government Be Different? , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[24]  A. Ho.  Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative , 2002 .

[25]  J. Nye,et al.  Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age , 2004 .

[26]  Mary Maureen Brown,et al.  The Benefits and Costs of Information Technology Innovations: An Empirical Assessment of a Local Government Agency , 2001 .

[27]  K. V. Andersen.  E-Government: Five key Challenges for Management , 2006 .

[28]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[29]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[31]  L. Caffrey.  Information Sharing between and within Governments , 2000 .

[32]  Douglas Raber,et al.  The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth , 2002 .

[33]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  K. Crenshaw.  Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics , 1989 .

[36]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[37]  D. Norris,et al.  Electronic Government at the Local Level , 2003 .

[38]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[39]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Lost in cyberspace: barriers to bridging the digital divide in e-politics , 2006, Int. J. Internet Enterp. Manag..

[40]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  G. Garson,et al.  The promise of digital government , 2004 .

[42]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Encyclopedia of Digital Government , 2006 .

[43]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Peter Flett,et al.  Managing Information & Systems , 2006 .

[45]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  The First Leg of E-Government Research: Domains and Application Areas 1998-2003 , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[46]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Digital Citizenship , 2004 .

[48]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Exploring E-Government Benefits and Success Factors , 2007 .

[49]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Defining the ‘Digital Divide’: Developing a Theoretical Understanding of Inequalities in the Information Age , 2002 .

[50]  George Kuk,et al.  The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Same Bed, Different Dreams? A Comparative Analysis of Citizen and Bureaucrat Perspectives on E-Government , 2005 .

[52]  Antonio Leal,et al.  A Validation Test of an Adaptation of the DeLone and McLean’s Model in the Spanish EIS Field 1 , 2002 .

[53]  L. Nelson.  Protecting the Common Good: Technology, Objectivity, and Privacy , 2002 .

[54]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Peter Muhlberger,et al.  Should e-government design for citizen participation?: stealth democracy and deliberation , 2006, DG.O.

[56]  Lisa J. Servon.  Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy , 2002 .

[57]  Meghan E. Cook.  Making a Case for Local E-Government: The New York Experience , 2002, Digital Government Research.

[58]  Nicola Lacey,et al.  Feminist legal theory , 1989 .

[59]  John Leslie King,et al.  Managing Information Systems: Change and Control in Organizational Computing , 1989 .

[60]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[61]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research , 2000 .

[62]  Brian D. Loader,et al.  Cyberspace divide: equality, agency and policy in the information society , 1998 .

[63]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Race, Place, and Information Technology , 2003 .

[64]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  E-Mexico: Collaborative Structures in Mexican Public Administration , 2007 .

[65]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[67]  Mehdi Khosrow-Pour,et al.  Encyclopedia of E-commerce, E-government and Mobile Commerce , 2006 .

[68]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The Policy Implications of Internet Connectivity in Public Libraries , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[69]  Emilio Paolucci,et al.  Urban Versus Regional Divide: Comparing and Classifying Digital Divide , 2005, TCGOV.

[70]  Judith Mariscal,et al.  Digital divide in Mexico , 2003 .

[71]  Bruce Bimber.  Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1 , 2000 .

[72]  G. Garson,et al.  Digital Government: Principles and Best Practices , 2003 .

[73]  Richard Heeks.  Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform , 2002 .

[74]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[75]  Daniela V. Dimitrova,et al.  Profiling the Adopters of E-Government Information and Services , 2006 .

[76]  K. Kraemer.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM: WILL THE TIME AFTER E-GOVERNMENT BE DIFFERENT? , 2003 .

[77]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Building strong e-democracy: the role of technology in developing democracy for the information age , 2003, CACM.

[78]  Kelly D. Edmiston.  State And Local E-Government , 2003 .

[79]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computerized Data-Based Systems and Productivity among Professional Workers: The Case of Detectives , 1985 .

[80]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems - Systemic constraints and effective practices , 2002, Advances in Digital Government.

[81]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[82]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Enacting State Websites: A Mixed Method Study Exploring E-Government Success in Multi-Organizational Settings , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[83]  David C. G. Brown,et al.  Electronic government and public administration , 2005 .

[84]  D. Stone.  Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making , 1997 .

[85]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[86]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[87]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[88]  Å. Grönlund.  Electronic Government: Design, Applications and Management , 2001 .

[89]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[90]  Richard Heeks.  Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .