The Role of Occlusion Cues in Apparent Motion

Classical apparent motion stimuli exhibit an inherent ambiguity with respect to the onsets and offsets of the stimulus elements. Sigman and Rock (1974, Perception 3 9 – 28) presented evidence suggesting that occlusion cues are used to resolve this ambiguity. We present results from experiments designed to further test predictions of this hypothesis. As expected, we found that the apparent motion of a target stimulus is suppressed when a ‘moving’ occluder is positioned such that it rationalises the onsets and offsets of the stimulus elements constituting the target. Somewhat unexpectedly, though, we also observed a slight tendency for motion suppression under conditions where the target was only partially occluded. The expected motion suppression occurred both with solid occluders and purely virtual Kanizsa-like occluders, although it was not always observed in the latter case. Motion suppression was found to occur over a wide range of stimulus onset asynchronies. Finally, we used binocular disparity cues to test the occlusion account of the motion suppression phenomenon against an alternative explanation in terms of attentional factors. The results are in clear favour of the occlusion account.

[1]  Paul C. Squires,et al.  The Influence of Hue on Apparent Visual Movement , 1931 .

[2]  Peter U. Tse,et al.  Neural correlates of transformational apparent motion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  C. Tyler.  Temporal characteristics in apparent movement: omega movement vs. phi movement. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  D. Navon,et al.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  R. Steinman,et al.  Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer’s discovery launched the Gestalt revolution , 2000, Vision Research.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[7]  J T Petersik,et al.  A New Bistable Motion Illusion Based upon ‘Kinetic Optical Occlusion’ , 1981, Perception.

[8]  E. Boring.  Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[9]  D. Allport.  Phenomenal simutaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis. , 1968, British journal of psychology.

[10]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attention and apparent motion. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[12]  B L Anderson,et al.  Reciprocal interactions between occlusion and motion computations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[14]  S. Anstis.  The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  P A Kolers,et al.  Color Logic of Apparent Motion , 1984, Perception.

[16]  R O Duncan,et al.  Occlusion and the Interpretation of Visual Motion: Perceptual and Neuronal Effects of Context , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Reichardt.  Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems , 1957 .

[18]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  P A Kolers,et al.  Figural change in apparent motion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  P. Bressan,et al.  Occlusion and the perception of coherent motion , 1991, Vision Research.

[23]  R T SAUCER,et al.  The nature of perceptual processes. , 1953, Science.

[24]  Hans Wallach.  Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  The line-motion illusion: attention or impletion? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Vebjørn Ekroll,et al.  Intermittent occlusion enhances the smoothness of sampled motion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[27]  S. Yantis.  Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects , 1995 .

[28]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  The role of parsing in high level motion processing , 1998 .

[29]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Unilateral Right Parietal Damage Leads to Bilateral Deficit for High-Level Motion , 2001, Neuron.

[30]  Howard S. Hock,et al.  Separating the edge-based detection of object motion from the objectless detection of motion energy , 2004 .

[31]  Edward H Adelson,et al.  The geometry of the occluding contour and its effect on motion interpretation. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[32]  J Faubert,et al.  Intraattribute and Interattribute Motion Induction , 1994, Perception.

[33]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of illusory occlusion in apparent motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[34]  C. O. Roelofs,et al.  Some aspects of apparent motion , 1953 .

[35]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[36]  S. M. Axstis.  PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS , 1970 .

[37]  Vebjørn Ekroll,et al.  Classification of apparent motion percepts based on temporal factors. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[38]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Early Computation of Contour Curvature and Part Structure: Evidence from Holes , 2004, Perception.

[39]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  How is a moving target continuously tracked behind occluding cover , 1997 .

[40]  Walter H. Ehrenstein,et al.  Basics of seeing motion , 2003 .

[41]  Sigm Exner,et al.  Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe , 2005, Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[42]  R T SAUCER,et al.  Processes of motion perception. , 1954, Science.

[43]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Voluntary and Stimulus-Induced Attention Detected as Motion Sensation , 1993, Perception.

[44]  Alex O Holcombe,et al.  Occlusion cues resolve sudden onsets into morphing or line motion, disocclusion, and sudden materialization. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[45]  I. Rock,et al.  Stroboscopic Movement Based on Perceptual Intelligence , 1974, Perception.

[46]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Amodal Representation of Occluded Surfaces: Role of Invisible Stimuli in Apparent Motion Correspondence , 1990, Perception.

[47]  A. Landauer,et al.  The phi‐phenomenon: Turning point or rallying point , 1966 .

[48]  Aijaz A. Baloch,et al.  A neural model of high-level motion processing: Line motion and formotion dynamics , 1997, Vision Research.

[49]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon , 1998, Vision Research.