Neural correlates of subliminal and supraliminal letter processing—An event-related fMRI study

One problem of interpreting research on subconscious processing is the possibility that participants are weakly conscious of the stimuli. Here, we compared the fMRI BOLD response in healthy adults to clearly visible single letters (supraliminal presentation) with the response to letters presented in the absence of any behavioural evidence of visibility (subliminal presentation). No letter catch trials served as a control condition. Forced-choice responses did not differ from chance when letter-to-background contrast was low, whereas they were almost 100% correct when contrast was high. A comparison of fMRI BOLD signals for supraliminal and subliminal letters with the control trials revealed a signal increase in left BA 37 (fusiform gyrus). Comparison of supraliminal with subliminal letters showed a significant increase in the right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44, partly extending to BA 9 and BA 45, as well as BA 46). Finally, a comparison of subliminal with supraliminal letters showed increases in the left middle temporal gyrus (BA 21) and the right extrastriate cortex (BA 19).

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Working Memory for Letters, Shapes, and Locations: fMRI Evidence against Stimulus-Based Regional Organization in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  D. Holender,et al.  Unconscious perception: The need for a paradigm shift , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  P. Merikle,et al.  Perception without awareness. Critical issues. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[5]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[6]  R A Koeppe,et al.  Instability of Localization of Cerebral Blood Flow Activation Foci with Parametric Maps , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  Jane E. Joseph,et al.  fMRI correlates of cortical specialization and generalization for letter processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  S. Haase,et al.  Valid distinctions between conscious and unconscious perception? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  T. Kjaer,et al.  Precuneus–Prefrontal Activity during Awareness of Visual Verbal Stimuli , 2001, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  R S Frackowiak,et al.  A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks. Influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  E. Bernat,et al.  Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Joseph,et al.  Shared and dissociated cortical regions for object and letter processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Using the talairach atlas with the MNI template , 2001, NeuroImage.

[17]  Jean-Luc Velay,et al.  Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  M. Tagamets,et al.  A Parametric Approach to Orthographic Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Differential effects of word length and visual contrast in the fusiform and lingual gyri during , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[22]  G. Rees,et al.  Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[24]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  C. Blundo,et al.  Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  F. Gregory.  The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory , 1998 .

[27]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[28]  E. Reingold,et al.  On demonstrating unconscious perception: comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998) , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Correlations between the fMRI BOLD Signal and Visual Perception , 2002, Neuron.

[30]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Discrimination and learning without awareness: a methodological survey and evaluation. , 1960, Psychological review.

[32]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  Regional brain activations differ for semantic features but not categories , 2002, Neuroreport.

[33]  M Dieterich,et al.  Hemifield visual motion stimulation: An example of interhemispheric crosstalk , 2000, Neuroreport.

[34]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: Shared demands on integration? , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[36]  Laurie A. Miller,et al.  Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  D. Chalmers.  The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory , 1996 .

[38]  S Zeki,et al.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  T A Polk,et al.  The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Matthew Brett,et al.  The neural basis of autobiographical and semantic memory: New evidence from three PET studies , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Eric R. Kandel,et al.  Perception of motion, depth and form , 2000 .

[45]  S Zeki,et al.  The autonomy of the visual systems and the modularity of conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[46]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  D. Hubel.  Exploration of the primary visual cortex, 1955–78 , 1982, Nature.

[48]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural Correlates of Visual Consciousness in Humans , 2004 .

[49]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Visual consciousness: Dissociating the neural correlates of perceptual transitions from sustained perception with fMRI , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[50]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness in humans , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[52]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination , 1999, Vision Research.

[53]  S. Wiens.  Subliminal emotion perception in brain imaging: findings, issues, and recommendations. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[54]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses , 2007, NeuroImage.

[55]  Shinobu Masaki,et al.  When meaningless symbols become letters: Neural activity change in learning new phonograms , 2005, NeuroImage.

[56]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[58]  K. James,et al.  Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory–motor brain network , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Sabine Windmann,et al.  Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Attentional Control over Bistable Vision , 2006 .

[60]  James R. Booth,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Intra- and Cross-Modal Lexical Tasks , 2002, NeuroImage.

[61]  Katharina Henke,et al.  Active hippocampus during nonconscious memories , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[62]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[63]  J. Rothwell.  Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[64]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[65]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[66]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[67]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[68]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .