Symposium review: Omics in dairy and animal science-Promise, potential, and pitfalls.

Sequencing the first genome took 15 yr and $3 billion to complete. Currently, a genome can be sequenced in a day for a few thousand dollars. Comparing the relative abundance of nearly every mRNA transcript and small RNAs from cells and tissues from different experimental conditions has become so easy that it can take longer to transfer the data between computers than to perform the experiment. Nucleotide sequencing techniques have become so sensitive that the greatest concern is not detecting a gene or transcript but rather, falsely identifying one. Better genome sequencing has led to more complete transcriptomic and proteomic databases and, combined with more sensitive instrumentation and separation techniques, is bringing us closer to detecting complete transcriptomes and proteomes. The promise of these powerful omics techniques is to lead us to new and unexpected connections between molecular processes in the context of animal health. This promise cannot be achieved without hypothesis-driven research that connects omics data with animal health experiments. Any researcher who wishes to invest the time and resources in omics experiments should be aware of the common pitfalls and limitations of these techniques so they can avoid these issues and maximize the use of these research tools. Several important questions must be asked: What is the quality of the databases and how they are annotated? Are the annotations based on experimental results or computational predictions? What assumptions are made by the analysis algorithms, and how will this affect the result? Finally, how can the research community use the vast amount of data being generated by omics experiments in ways to achieve the goals of better animal health and production (which is the promise of omics technologies)? Until the observations shown in omics data sets are used to achieve the goals of better animal health and production, the potential of omics technology will not be fully realized.

[1]  J. Loor,et al.  Ruminant Metabolic Systems Biology: Reconstruction and Integration of Transcriptome Dynamics Underlying Functional Responses of Tissues to Nutrition and Physiological Statea , 2012, Gene regulation and systems biology.

[2]  E. Bendixen,et al.  The mammary gland in domestic ruminants: a systems biology perspective. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[3]  J. Bonfield,et al.  Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome , 2004, Nature.

[4]  R. Zubarev The challenge of the proteome dynamic range and its implications for in‐depth proteomics , 2013, Proteomics.

[5]  J. Goff,et al.  Neutrophil extracellular trap formation by bovine neutrophils is not inhibited by milk. , 2006, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[6]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Whole-Genome Resequencing of Holstein Bulls for Indel Discovery and Identification of Genes Associated with Milk Composition Traits in Dairy Cattle , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Veronika Vidova,et al.  A review on mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics: Targeted and data independent acquisition. , 2017, Analytica chimica acta.

[8]  Daniel J. Gaffney,et al.  A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis , 2016, Genome Biology.

[9]  J. Hocquette,et al.  Does growth path influence beef lipid deposition and fatty acid composition? , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  A. Bittner,et al.  Comparison of RNA-Seq and Microarray in Transcriptome Profiling of Activated T Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Differential Gene Expression of Three Mastitis-Causing Escherichia coli Strains Grown under Planktonic, Swimming, and Swarming Culture Conditions , 2016, mSystems.

[12]  J. Loor,et al.  Functional Adaptations of the Transcriptome to Mastitis-Causing Pathogens: The Mammary Gland and Beyond , 2011, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[13]  G. L. Bennett,et al.  Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[14]  P. Pevzner,et al.  False discovery rates of protein identifications: a strike against the two-peptide rule. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  Leroy Hood,et al.  What did the human genome project entail ? , 2013 .

[16]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of Escherichia coli Strains Associated with Persistent and Transient Bovine Mastitis and the Role of Colanic Acid , 2017, Infection and Immunity.

[17]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Centennial paper: Proteomics in animal science. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[18]  J. Dekkers,et al.  Evidence for a major QTL associated with host response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus challenge. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[19]  J. Grossmann,et al.  The goat (Capra hircus) mammary gland secretory tissue proteome as influenced by weight loss: A study using label free proteomics. , 2016, Journal of proteomics.

[20]  U. Kusebauch,et al.  Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry of mastitis milk reveals pathogen-specific regulation of bovine host response proteins. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Marcel H. Schulz,et al.  A Global View of Gene Activity and Alternative Splicing by Deep Sequencing of the Human Transcriptome , 2008, Science.

[22]  Hans H. Cheng,et al.  Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project , 2015, Genome Biology.

[23]  K. Worley,et al.  The Genome Sequence of Taurine Cattle: A Window to Ruminant Biology and Evolution , 2009, Science.

[24]  Jianxin Liu,et al.  The Use of “Omics” in Lactation Research in Dairy Cows , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[25]  Timothy P. L. Smith,et al.  Development and Characterization of a High Density SNP Genotyping Assay for Cattle , 2009, PloS one.

[26]  Jonas Korlach,et al.  Discovery and genotyping of structural variation from long-read haploid genome sequence data , 2017, Genome research.

[27]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Differential expression analysis of proteins from neutrophils in the periparturient period and neutrophils from dexamethasone-treated dairy cows. , 2006, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[28]  M. Settles,et al.  GSEA-SNP identifies genes associated with Johne’s disease in cattle , 2010, Mammalian Genome.

[29]  Tad S Sonstegard,et al.  Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[30]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Proteomic analysis reveals protein expression differences in Escherichia coli strains associated with persistent versus transient mastitis. , 2014, Journal of proteomics.

[31]  Shu-Dong Zhang,et al.  Bioinformatics Original Paper Effect of Pooling Samples on the Efficiency of Comparative Studies Using Microarrays , 2022 .

[32]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  Protein Bioinformatics Databases and Resources. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[33]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[34]  G. Barton,et al.  How many biological replicates are needed in an RNA-seq experiment and which differential expression tool should you use? , 2015, RNA.

[35]  V. Pascual,et al.  Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics , 2010, BMC Biology.

[36]  M. Laan,et al.  Effects of RNA integrity on transcript quantification by total RNA sequencing of clinically collected human placental samples , 2017, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[37]  J. Lippolis,et al.  The effect of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment prior to experimental mastitis in lactating Holsteins. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  B. Frey,et al.  Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[39]  R. Pena,et al.  Application of the microarray technology to the transcriptional analysis of muscle phenotypes in pigs. , 2014, Animal genetics.

[40]  Stephen C. J. Parker,et al.  Accurate and comprehensive sequencing of personal genomes. , 2011, Genome research.

[41]  R. Sackstein,et al.  G-CSF Induces Membrane Expression of a Myeloperoxidase Glycovariant that Operates as an E-selectin Ligand on Human Myeloid Cells , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Douglas A. Hosack,et al.  Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE , 2003, Genome Biology.

[43]  A. Zychlinsky,et al.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Kill Bacteria , 2004, Science.

[44]  Chris Sander,et al.  Human SRMAtlas: A Resource of Targeted Assays to Quantify the Complete Human Proteome , 2016, Cell.

[45]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Utility, limitations, and promise of proteomics in animal science. , 2010, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[46]  C. Ponting,et al.  Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[47]  L. Bargelloni,et al.  Transcriptomic profiling as a screening tool to detect trenbolone treatment in beef cattle. , 2014, Research in veterinary science.

[48]  Albert Vexler,et al.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection. , 2008, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[49]  G. L. Bennett,et al.  A genomewide association study identified CYP2J2 as a gene controlling serum vitamin D status in beef cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[50]  J. Keele,et al.  A genome-wide association study for the incidence of persistent bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in cattle. , 2013, Animal genetics.

[51]  Y. Gilad,et al.  RNA-seq: impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification , 2014, BMC Biology.

[52]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Bovine milk proteome: quantitative changes in normal milk exosomes, milk fat globule membranes and whey proteomes resulting from Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[53]  J. Gergen,et al.  Filter replicas and permanent collections of recombinant DNA plasmids. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  C. Mason,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data , 2013, Genome Biology.

[55]  John Hardy,et al.  Genome, transcriptome and proteome: the rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences , 2016, Briefings Bioinform..

[56]  A. Kelleher,et al.  Detecting Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses: From Bulk Populations to Single Cells , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[57]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Considerations for Farm Animal Proteomic Experiments: An Introductory View Gel-Based Versus Non-gel-Based Approaches , 2018 .

[58]  Juancarlos Chan,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[59]  J. Lippolis,et al.  Proteomic survey of bovine neutrophils. , 2005, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[60]  Timothy P. L. Smith,et al.  Association, effects and validation of polymorphisms within the NCAPG - LCORL locus located on BTA6 with feed intake, gain, meat and carcass traits in beef cattle , 2011, BMC Genetics.

[61]  Martijs J Jonker,et al.  Valuable lessons-learned in transcriptomics experimentation , 2015, Transcription.

[62]  P. D. de Jong,et al.  A cattle-human comparative map built with cattle BAC-ends and human genome sequence. , 2003, Genome research.

[63]  J. Dekkers Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[64]  J. Keele,et al.  A second-generation linkage map of the bovine genome. , 1997, Genome research.

[65]  Tad S Sonstegard,et al.  Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle: The USDA Experience. , 2017, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[66]  F. Collins,et al.  A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.

[67]  Daphne H. E. W. Huberts,et al.  Moonlighting proteins: an intriguing mode of multitasking. , 2010, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[68]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Getting Started in Gene Orthology and Functional Analysis , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[69]  D. Lynn,et al.  MicroRNA Regulation of Bovine Monocyte Inflammatory and Metabolic Networks in an In Vivo Infection Model , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.