Combining soft system methodology and pareto analysis in safety management performance assessment

Although reengineering is strategically advantageous for organisations in order to keep functional and sustainable, safety must remain a priority and respective efforts need to be maintained. This paper suggests the combination of soft system methodology (SSM) and Pareto analysis on the scope of safety management performance evaluation, and presents the results of a survey, which was conducted in order to assess the effectiveness, efficacy and ethicality of the individual components of an organisation's safety program. The research employed quantitative and qualitative data and ensured a broad representation of functional managers and safety professionals, who collectively hold the responsibility for planning, implementing and monitoring safety practices. The results showed that SSM can support the assessment of safety management performance by revealing weaknesses of safety initiatives, and Pareto analysis can underwrite the prioritisation of the remedies required. The specific methodology might be adapted by any organisation that requires a deep evaluation of its safety management performance, seeks to uncover the mechanisms that affect such performance, and, under limited resources, needs to focus on the most influential deficiencies.

[1]  Steven E. Stemler,et al.  An Overview of Content Analysis. , 2001 .

[2]  J. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[3]  Hesan A. Quazi,et al.  A methodology for developing a self‐assessment tool to measure quality performance in organizations , 2001 .

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  Joseph Moses Juran THE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS , 2000 .

[6]  Alexandros Psychogios,et al.  Understanding Total Quality Management in Context: Qualitative Research on Managers' Awareness of TQM Aspects in the Greek Service Industry , 2007 .

[7]  P. Checkland Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[8]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[9]  Sid Kemp Quality management demystified , 2005 .

[10]  David Hoyle,et al.  Quality Management Essentials , 2007 .

[11]  Alan J. Stolzer,et al.  Safety management systems in aviation , 2008 .

[12]  Soft systems methodology , 2008 .

[13]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Real world research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Implementation of total quality management : an empirical study of Chinese manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[15]  Eva Sgourou,et al.  Using Soft Systems Methodology as a Systemic Approach to Safety Performance Evaluation , 2012 .

[16]  Yumin Liu,et al.  QFD Model for Quality Performance Self‐assessment , 2006 .

[17]  K. A. Adebiyi,et al.  Safety performance evaluation models: a review , 2007 .

[18]  Nektarios Karanikas Defining the interrelationship between safety and quality management systems , 2014 .