Convergence Analysis and Iteration Estimation for a Coupled Design Process With Overlap in Redesign

In Smith and Eppinger's pioneering research on coupled design processes, the dynamics of design iterations is modeled by a linear model, which implies that there is no overlap between redesign work and allows redesign workload to be more than the original design workload. Actually, this overlap often exists in practice and, therefore, reduces the total redesign workload. In this paper, we propose a nonlinear model for a coupled design process with overlap between redesign work and ensure that redesign workload is less than the original design workload. Based on the model, the sufficiency condition for the convergence of such a design process is proposed. A heuristic rule is also given to reduce the possibility of considering a design process that converges as one that does not converge. Furthermore, we develop a sufficiency condition for estimating the number of design iterations before converging as such an estimate is important for planning product development projects. Another heuristic rule is also introduced to increase the accuracy of estimating design iterations. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted to examine the correctness and performance of the proposed sufficiency conditions and heuristic rules.

[1]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .

[2]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[3]  David E. Bell,et al.  Sequential Testing in Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Dan Braha,et al.  Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  The Statistical Mechanics of Complex Product Development: Empirical and Analytical Results , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Hisham M. E. Abdelsalam,et al.  A simulation-based optimization framework for product development cycle time reduction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Adaptive Weighted Sum Method for Multiobjective Optimization , 2004 .

[9]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Yoram Reich,et al.  From DSM-Based Planning to Design Process Simulation: A Review of Process Scheme Logic Verification Issues , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[12]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Process Sequencing With Competent Genetic Algorithms , 2007 .

[13]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Reengineering of design and manufacturing processes , 1994 .

[14]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[16]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Ian R. Chittick,et al.  Aero-structural optimization using adjoint coupled post-optimality sensitivities , 2008 .

[18]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Information Leaders in Product Development Organizational Networks: Social Network Analysis of the Design Structure Matrix , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[19]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design , 1997 .

[20]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Combined Optimal Design and Control With Application to an , 2002 .

[21]  Dan Braha,et al.  The Topology of Large-Scale Engineering Problem-Solving Networks , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[23]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Problem - Solving Oscillations in Complex Engineering Projects , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Zheng Wang,et al.  A Proportional - Integral Control Policy of Two Coupled Concurrent Design Optimization Processes , 2010, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[25]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[26]  I. Kim,et al.  Adaptive weighted sum method for multiobjective optimization: a new method for Pareto front generation , 2006 .

[27]  Annalisa L. Weigel,et al.  An application of the Design Structure Matrix to Integrated Concurrent Engineering , 2010 .

[28]  J. E. Renaud,et al.  A multidisciplinary design optimization approach for high temperature aircraft engine components , 1998 .

[29]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Integrating linear physical programming within collaborative optimization for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization , 2005 .