Instrumentation in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Studies in the 1960s demonstrated the problems of variability in susceptibility testing methods, especially those affecting the performance of disc diffusion procedures. These studies made apparent the need for standardization and resulted in more clearly defined performance limits for growth medium, incubation conditions, inoculum concentration, disc content for diffusion methods, the setting of interpretative MIC breakpoints and the establishment of quality control parameters. More recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of instrumentation for reading disc diffusion tests and the endpoints of agar or broth dilution MIC determinations. Instrumentation ranges in complexity from the simple optical reading of zones of inhibition or growth endpoints, requiring operator interpretation, to more sophisticated devices for reading, recording and 'expert system' analysis of results with interfacing of instruments to laboratory information management systems. Some of the more developed systems are fully automated and can also identify the organisms tested. The pressure to reduce labour costs and provide results earlier favours the use of more automated systems whilst the requirement for resistance surveillance provides impetus for the use of systems that provide quantitative results and electronic data handling.

[1]  E. Steers,et al.  An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. , 1959, Antibiotics & chemotherapy.

[2]  E K Korgenski,et al.  Evaluation of the BIOMIC Video Reader System for Determining Interpretive Categories of Isolates on the Basis of Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Results , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  F. Moosdeen,et al.  Standardization of inoculum size for disc susceptibility testing: a preliminary report of a spectrophotometric method. , 1988, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

[4]  M. Gradus,et al.  Evaluation of the BIOGRAM antimicrobial susceptibility test system , 1985, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[5]  D. Livermore,et al.  Interpretative reading: recognizing the unusual and inferring resistance mechanisms from resistance phenotypes. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[6]  A. Medeiros,et al.  Evaluation of the Sirscan Automated Zone Reader in a Clinical Microbiology Laboratory , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  M. Marsilio,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance in key bloodstream bacterial isolates: electronic surveillance with the Surveillance Network Database--USA. , 1999, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  J. Sherris,et al.  Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study. , 1971, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology.

[9]  R Wise,et al.  Evaluation of the Oxoid Aura image system for measuring zones of inhibition with the disc diffusion technique. , 2000, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.