Methylation Biomarker Panel Performance in EsophaCap Cytology Samples for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Prospective Validation Study

Purpose: Barrett's esophagus is the only known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Although endoscopy and biopsy are standard methods for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis, their high cost and risk limit their use as a screening modality. Here, we sought to develop a Barrett's esophagus detection method based on methylation status in cytology samples captured by EsophaCap using a streamlined sensitive technique, methylation on beads (MOB). Experimental Design: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 80 patients (52 in the training set; 28 in the test set). We used MOB to extract and bisulfite-convert DNA, followed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR to assess methylation levels of 8 previously selected candidate markers. Lasso regression was applied to establish a prediction model in the training set, which was then tested on the independent test set. Results: In the training set, five of eight candidate methylation biomarkers (p16, HPP1, NELL1, TAC1, and AKAP12) were significantly higher in Barrett's esophagus patients than in controls. We built a four-biomarker-plus-age lasso regression model for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. The AUC was 0.894, with sensitivity 94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71%–99%] and specificity 62.2% (95% CI, 44.6%–77.3%) in the training set. This model also performed with high accuracy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis in an independent test set: AUC = 0.929 (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.810%–1%), with sensitivity=78.6% (95% CI, 48.8%–94.3%) and specificity = 92.8% (95% CI, 64.1%–99.6%). Conclusions: EsophaCap, in combination with an epigenetic biomarker panel and the MOB method, is a promising, well-tolerated, low-cost esophageal sampling strategy for Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. This approach merits further prospective studies in larger populations.

[1]  Herbert C. Wolfsen,et al.  Highly Discriminant Methylated DNA Markers for the Non‐endoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus , 2018, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[2]  T. LaFramboise,et al.  Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett’s esophagus , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  M. O’Donovan,et al.  Methylation panel is a diagnostic biomarker for Barrett’s oesophagus in endoscopic biopsies and non-endoscopic cytology specimens , 2017, Gut.

[4]  A. Chak,et al.  Global DNA methylation patterns in Barrett’s esophagus, dysplastic Barrett’s, and esophageal adenocarcinoma are associated with BMI, gender, and tobacco use , 2016, Clinical Epigenetics.

[5]  J. Herman,et al.  Early Detection of Lung Cancer Using DNA Promoter Hypermethylation in Plasma and Sputum , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  Kenneth K Wang,et al.  Screening for Barrett's Esophagus. , 2015, Gastroenterology.

[7]  Sarmed S. Sami,et al.  Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[8]  H. El‐Serag,et al.  Surveillance endoscopy is associated with improved outcomes of oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected in patients with Barrett's oesophagus , 2014, Gut.

[9]  J. Jankowski,et al.  Trefoil Factor Expression in a Human Model of the Early Stages of Barrett’s Esophagus , 2015, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[10]  Tza-Huei Wang,et al.  The promise of methylation on beads for cancer detection and treatment , 2014, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[11]  A. Gavin,et al.  Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus: a population-based study , 2014, Gut.

[12]  Tza-Huei Wang,et al.  Extraction and processing of circulating DNA from large sample volumes using methylation on beads for the detection of rare epigenetic events. , 2013, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[13]  S. Spechler,et al.  Barrett esophagus and risk of esophageal cancer: a clinical review. , 2013, JAMA.

[14]  J. Davison,et al.  Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video). , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  R. Fitzgerald,et al.  Randomized crossover study comparing efficacy of transnasal endoscopy with that of standard endoscopy to detect Barrett's esophagus. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[18]  Paul K Crane,et al.  lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[19]  Bin Wang,et al.  Deconvolution Estimation in Measurement Error Models: The R Package decon. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[20]  Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett’s oesophagus in primary care: cohort study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  J. Emery,et al.  Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett’s oesophagus in primary care: cohort study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  G. Falk,et al.  Brush cytology vs. endoscopic biopsy for the surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. , 2010, Endoscopy.

[23]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Single-tube analysis of DNA methylation with silica superparamagnetic beads. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  B. Reid,et al.  Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: time for a new synthesis , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[25]  G. Lyratzopoulos,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening followed by surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a review. , 2009, Gastroenterology.

[26]  A. Bhattacharyya,et al.  A multicenter, double-blinded validation study of methylation biomarkers for progression prediction in Barrett's esophagus. , 2009, Cancer research.

[27]  D. Beer,et al.  Promoter hypermethylation of CDH13 is a common, early event in human esophageal adenocarcinogenesis and correlates with clinical risk factors , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[28]  W. Chow,et al.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  J. G. de Groot,et al.  Assessment of chromosomal gains as compared to DNA content changes is more useful to detect dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus brush cytology specimens , 2008, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[30]  Tetsuo Ito,et al.  Hypermethylation of the AKAP12 Promoter is a Biomarker of Barrett's-Associated Esophageal Neoplastic Progression , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[31]  F. Sato,et al.  Hypermethylation of the somatostatin promoter is a common, early event in human esophageal carcinogenesis , 2008, Cancer.

[32]  D. Beer,et al.  Hypermethylation of Tachykinin-1 Is a Potential Biomarker in Human Esophageal Cancer , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  Tetsuo Ito,et al.  Hypermethylation of the nel-like 1 gene is a common and early event and is associated with poor prognosis in early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma , 2007, Oncogene.

[34]  M. Brock,et al.  The use of “overall accuracy” to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[35]  J. Hunter,et al.  Office-Based Unsedated Small-Caliber Endoscopy Is Equivalent to Conventional Sedated Endoscopy in Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus: A Randomized and Blinded Comparison , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[36]  H. Wolfsen,et al.  Barrett's Esophagus Is Common in Older Men and Women Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy Regardless of Reflux Symptoms , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[37]  M. Pepe,et al.  Inactivation of p16, RUNX3, and HPP1 occurs early in Barrett's-associated neoplastic progression and predicts progression risk , 2005, Oncogene.

[38]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[39]  G. Falk Cytology in Barrett's esophagus. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[40]  A. Fendrick,et al.  Screening and Surveillance for Barrett Esophagus in High-Risk Groups: A CostUtility Analysis , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[41]  Sushovan Guha,et al.  Preoperative prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[42]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Screening for high-grade dysplasia in gastroesophageal reflux disease: is it cost-effective? , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[43]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[44]  R. Tibshirani The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Diagnostic value of cytopathology in Barrett esophagus and associated carcinoma. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[46]  S. Witte [Cytologic diagnosis of the upper gastrointestinal tract]. , 1984, Leber, Magen, Darm.