Long-term Cardiac Maintenance Programming

Cardiac maintenance programs (CMPs) are designed to sustain or improve health after completing early cardiac rehabilitation. We retrospectively analyzed data from 207 patients for up to 20 yr of CMP participation. It is unclear whether long-term participation in CMP slows the normal cardiovascular deterioration process due to aging. Purpose: Greater than 65% of all cardiac mortality is related to coronary artery disease (CAD). Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) aims to reduce cardiovascular risk and number of hospital readmissions. Cardiac maintenance programs (CMPs) are designed to sustain or improve health after completing early CR. Although CMPs are supported by most national health guidelines, few long-term studies on these diverse programs have been performed. Methods: This was a retrospective repeated-measures analysis with case-controlled subanalysis. Within-subject differences for CMP participants were examined between enrollment and last clinical visit. Assessments included medical history, anthropometry, blood analysis, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. A subset of 20 CMP participants were compared with 20 patients with CAD who chose not to participate in CMP, matched for age, sex, and follow-up duration. Results: A total of 207 patients (60 ± 9 yr, 16% female) were included for the primary analyses. Average follow-up was 6.3 ± 4.8 yr (range 4-20 yr). CMP participants reduced peak workload (1.76 ± 0.56 to 1.60 ± 0.58 W/kg; P < .001) and aerobic capacity (26.1 ± 6.2 to 24.6 ± 7.1 mL/kg/min; P = .003). High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol increased significantly (48 ± 12 to 51 ± 14 mg/dL; P < .001), whereas all other metabolic risk factors remained unaffected. Matched controls had higher functional capacity (2.35 ± 0.81 vs 1.56 ± 0.52 W/kg; P < .001) and lower body mass index (25.3 ± 3.6 vs 28.6 ± 3.9 kg/m2) at baseline, but no significant differences with respect to long-term efficacy were observed. Conclusions: Long-term participation in CMP did not result in maintaining functional capacity or cardiovascular risk profile in patients with CAD. However, compared with matched nonparticipants, CMP participants (are more deconditioned at baseline) but do not seem to deteriorate as quickly.

[1]  L. Cugusi,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation in women: state of the art and strategies to overcome the current barriers , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[2]  A. Pressler,et al.  Individualized vs. group exercise in improving quality of life and physical activity in patients with cardiac disease and low exercise capacity: results from the DOPPELHERZ trial , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  G. Furgi,et al.  Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation programs from the Italian survey on cardiac rehabilitation (ISYDE-2008). , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  G. Balady,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation 2012: Advancing the Field Through Emerging Science , 2012, Circulation.

[5]  Prof. Dr. H.W. Hahmann Kardiologische Rehabilitation , 2012, Herz.

[6]  T. Takken,et al.  Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular disease (Part III) , 2012, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[7]  A. Støylen,et al.  Aerobic interval training increases peak oxygen uptake more than usual care exercise training in myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled study , 2012, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  T. Church,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Mass Index on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in Men: The Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study , 2011, Circulation.

[9]  John Spertus,et al.  AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. , 2011, Circulation.

[10]  A. Støylen,et al.  Long-term follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study of usual care exercise training versus aerobic interval training after myocardial infarction. , 2011, International Journal of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Pressler,et al.  Körperliches Training bei Herzinsuffizienz: Effektivität jenseits der medikamentösen Therapie? , 2011, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[12]  H. Raspe,et al.  In-patient cardiac rehabilitation versus medical care – a prospective multicentre controlled 12 months follow-up in patients with coronary heart disease , 2011, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[13]  G. Steinbeck,et al.  OMEGA, a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Test the Effect of Highly Purified Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Top of Modern Guideline-Adjusted Therapy After Myocardial Infarction , 2010, Circulation.

[14]  Demosthenes B Panagiotakos,et al.  Exercise capacity and mortality in older men: a 20-year follow-up study. , 2010, Circulation.

[15]  H. McGee,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[16]  G. Rauch,et al.  Effect of early short-term cardiac rehabilitation after acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction on 1-year mortality , 2010, Current medical research and opinion.

[17]  Paul Dendale,et al.  Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[18]  K. Schulman,et al.  Relationship Between Cardiac Rehabilitation and Long-Term Risks of Death and Myocardial Infarction Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries , 2010, Circulation.

[19]  E. Staal,et al.  High-intensity interval training may reduce in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation A randomized controlled trial evaluating the relationship to endothelial function and inflammation. , 2009, American heart journal.

[20]  B. Bjarnason-Wehrens,et al.  Leitlinie körperliche Aktivität zur Sekundärprävention und Therapie kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen , 2009 .

[21]  Godfrey L. Smith,et al.  Superior Cardiovascular Effect of Aerobic Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Study , 2007, Circulation.

[22]  B. Bjarnason-Wehrens,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation in Germany , 2007, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[23]  B. Bjarnason-Wehrens,et al.  Herzgruppen in Deutschland—Status quo und Perspektiven , 2006, Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen.

[24]  A. Lipson,et al.  CARDIAC REHABILITATION PROGRAMS: A REPORT ON A CANADA WIDE SURVEY , 2006 .

[25]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[26]  Christopher H. Morrell,et al.  Accelerated Longitudinal Decline of Aerobic Capacity in Healthy Older Adults , 2005, Circulation.

[27]  B. Bjarnason-Wehrens,et al.  Recommendations for resistance exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. Recommendations of the German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2004, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[28]  K. Held,et al.  Langzeitwirkungen der Nachsorge in einer ambulanten Herzgruppe Eine Fall-/Kontrollstudie , 2002, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.

[29]  C. Lamendola,et al.  National Survey on Gender Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. Patient characteristics and enrollment patterns. , 1996, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[30]  A. Sarana,et al.  CARDIAC REHABILITATION , 1974, The Lancet.

[31]  A. Pressler,et al.  Effect of Individualized Combined Exercise Versus Group-Based Maintenance Exercise in Patients With Heart Disease and Reduced Exercise Capacity: THE DOPPELHERZ TRIAL , 2018, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[32]  H. Baenkler Deutsche Gesellschaft für Präventivmedizin und Präventionsmanagement e.V. , 2014 .

[33]  H. Kohl,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Mass Index on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in Men: The Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study , 2012 .

[34]  R. Shephard Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Community , 2012 .

[35]  M. Halle,et al.  Exercise Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2010 .