Generating implications for design through design research

A central tenet of HCI is that technology should be user-centric, with designs being based around social science findings about users. Nevertheless a repeated but critical challenge in design is translating empirical findings into actionable ideas that inform design, or generating implications for design. Despite various design methods aiming to bridge this gap, knowledge informing design is still seen as problematic. However there has been little empirical exploration into what design researchers understand by such design knowledge, the functions and principles behind their creation. We report on interviews with twelve expert HCI design researchers probing the roles and types of design implications, and the process of generating and evaluating them. We synthesize different types of design implications into a framework to guide their generation. Our findings identify a broader range than previously described, additional sources and heuristics supporting their development as well some important evaluation criteria. We discuss the value of these findings for interaction design research.

[1]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Ethnography in Ubiquitous Computing , 2010, Ubicomp 2010.

[2]  Murray Silverstein,et al.  A Pattern Language , 1977 .

[3]  Jeff A. Johnson,et al.  The Xerox Star: a retrospective , 1989, Computer.

[4]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development: john wiley & sons , 1995 .

[5]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[6]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[7]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[8]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Designing with ethnography: a presentation framework for design , 1997, DIS '97.

[9]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Implications for design , 2006, CHI.

[10]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Edition) , 2003 .

[11]  Jan Stage,et al.  Handbook of Research on User Interface Design and Evaluation for Mobile Technology , 2008 .

[12]  Johan Redström,et al.  Computational composites , 2007, CHI.

[13]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Improving visibility of remote gestures in distributed tabletop collaboration , 2011, CSCW '11.

[14]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[15]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research , 2012, TCHI.

[16]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design , 1989, CHI '89.

[17]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[18]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[19]  J. Schofield Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. , 1993 .

[20]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction, third edition , 2004 .

[21]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[23]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Faltering from ethnography to design , 1992, CSCW '92.

[24]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Handling documents and discriminating objects in hybrid spaces , 2006, CHI.

[25]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[26]  J. Paay From Ethnography to Interface Design , 2008 .

[27]  Corina Sas,et al.  Do emotions matter in creative design? , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  David Benyon,et al.  Ethnography, theory and systems design: from intuition to insight , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  User-centered System Design , 2011 .

[30]  Bill Sullivan,et al.  THE INMATES ARE RUNNING THE ASYLUM , 2000 .

[31]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[32]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[33]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.

[34]  M. Rouncefield,et al.  Ethnomethodologically Informed Ethnography and Information System Design. , 2000 .

[35]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[36]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Repairing Damaged Merchandise: A Rejoinder , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Ethnography and design , 1994, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[38]  H. Blumer What Is Wrong with Social Theory , 1954 .

[39]  T. Rodden,et al.  Ethnography and Design ? , 2001 .