Global estimation of animal diversity using automatic acoustic sensors

The estimation of biodiversity can be considered as one of the main challenges in modern biology. When dealing with ecology, evolutionary biology and conservation biology, there is an inescapable need to describe the composition and dynamics of biological diversity (Magurran, 2004). In ecology, the concept of biological diversity is mainly species-oriented, even if other evolutionary units or traits can also be used. In this context, biodiversity potentially refers to all species encountered in a given area at a specified time, including every potential species from underground bacteria to giant trees. Therefore, biodiversity assessment can turn out to be a time-consuming and complex task, as it relies on species inventory that may involve very different taxonomic groups. Exhaustive approaches such as the all taxa biodiversity inventory (ATbI) programs aim at inventorying the whole biodiversity mainly in tropical habitats (Gewin, 2002), but these programs are highly sensitive to the logistic and time-constraints of most inventory studies. An alternative to these approaches is to focus on one or a few taxa and consider them as biodiversity indicators (Pearson, 1994), but the choice of representative taxa is not trivial (Lawton et al., 1998). In addition, it is well known that patterns of species diversity for different taxa are sensitive to the observation scale. More precisely, there is a general congruence for species diversity between different taxa at a large area scale (more than 1km 2) but not at a fine scale (less than 1km 2 , Weaver, 1995). This renders difficult the definition of an indicator taxon or even of several indicator taxa supposedly representative of the diversity in other forms of organisms (Ricketts 100 Biodiversity et al., 1999). Irrespective of the taxonomic breadth of any biodiversity assessment, the estimation of species biodiversity relies on inventories and species examination by one or several taxonomic experts that can be supported with genetic barcoding techniques (see chapter II, 3). Sampling in the field and identification in museum collections can require a considerable effort when the objective is to sample a large region for a long time period. To improve the rate of specimen collection, non-specialist taxonomic workers – or para-taxonomists – can separate morpho-species instead of identifying valid species. This solution is advocated by the rapid biodiversity assessment (RbA) programs that have been especially developed for the rapid exploration of biodiversity in tropical habitats Biodiversity assessment is often restricted to species richness, i.e. to the counting …

[1]  G. Pavan,et al.  Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories , 2010 .

[2]  Mark Ridley,et al.  Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior: A research program in comparative biology , 1991 .

[3]  Calyampudi R. Rao The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research , 1964 .

[4]  S. Vaseghi,et al.  Spectral Subtraction 11.1 Spectral Subtraction 11.2 Processing Distortions 11.3 Non-linear Spectral Subtraction 11.4 Implementation of Spectral Subtraction S Noise-free Signal Space Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction, Second Edition , 2022 .

[5]  P. Grandcolas Phylogenetic analysis and the study of community structure , 1998 .

[6]  A. Peterson,et al.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  A. Groothuis Advances in the Study of Behavior , 1993 .

[9]  D. Pearson,et al.  Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  Nadia Pieretti,et al.  The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: A Mediterranean Europe case-study , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[11]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[13]  Partitioning of vocal activity in a Neotropical highland-frog community , 2000 .

[14]  I. Oliver,et al.  Invertebrate Morphospecies as Surrogates for Species: A Case Study , 1996 .

[15]  David A. Luther,et al.  The influence of the acoustic community on songs of birds in a neotropical rain forest , 2009 .

[16]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[17]  Z. Cano-Santana,et al.  Modified Petraborg index applied to the sampling of male crickets by aural detection , 2008 .

[18]  Stephen T. Neely,et al.  Signals, Sound, and Sensation , 1997 .

[19]  A. Suarez,et al.  The Value of Museum Collections for Research and Society , 2004 .

[20]  Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera,et al.  Using Automated Digital Recording Systems as Effective Tools for the Monitoring of Birds and Amphibians , 2006 .

[21]  Kai Wang,et al.  Remote Sensing of Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation: A Review from the Perspective of Remote Sensing Specialists , 2010, Sensors.

[22]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[23]  Ian Oliver,et al.  A Possible Method for the Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity , 1993 .

[24]  N. Mawdsley,et al.  Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest , 1998, Nature.

[25]  S. Gage,et al.  Soundscape characteristics of an environment: A new ecological indicator of ecosystem health , 2008 .

[26]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[27]  J. C. Weaver Indicator Species and Scale of Observation , 1995 .

[28]  Matthias Stevens,et al.  Participatory noise pollution monitoring using mobile phones , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[29]  J. Sueur Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae) , 2002 .

[30]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Hierarchical partitioning of evolutionary and ecological patterns in the organization of phylogenetically-structured species assemblages: application to rockfish (genus: Sebastes) in the Southern California Bight. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[31]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Who's Where in North America? , 1999 .

[32]  C. Pipper,et al.  [''R"--project for statistical computing]. , 2008, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[33]  Almo Farina,et al.  A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) , 2011 .

[34]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Sound and recording: An introduction , 1992 .

[35]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[36]  Paola Laiolo,et al.  The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation , 2010 .

[37]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[38]  P. K. Stoddard,et al.  Application of Filters in Bioacoustics , 1998 .

[39]  D. Chessel,et al.  Measuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics , 2002, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[40]  Eoin J. O’Gorman,et al.  A functional guide to functional diversity measures , 2009 .

[41]  Mark D Skowronski,et al.  Acoustic detection and classification of Microchiroptera using machine learning: lessons learned from automatic speech recognition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal , 2008, PloS one.

[43]  Sandrine Pavoine,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Ecological Indicators Monitoring Animal Diversity Using Acoustic Indices: Implementation in a Temperate Woodland , 2022 .