Segmentation Opportunities for a Social Planner: Impact of Limited Resources

In this research note, we investigate segmentation opportunities for social planners such as government agencies, nonprofits, and public organizations. These opportunities arise when the potential products are vertically (quality) differentiated and the consumers are heterogeneous in their preferences toward quality. In these cases, whether to offer quality differentiated products and what quality level to choose are important decisions for a social planner. In this research note, we identify the conditions where it is socially optimal to offer either one homogenous or two quality differentiated products. We find that the resource limitations may result in a single product offering and that the quality of the product depends on the maximum surplus per unit resource consumed by the products. We also compare our findings to a profit-maximizing firm. We find that the resource limitations may cause a profit-maximizing firm to provide a better service to some consumers than the social planner. Contrary to common wisdom, we also show that the capacity limitations may force the social planner to act like a profit-maximizing firm in terms of its pricing and product mix choice.

[1]  Mario Pezzino,et al.  Mixed Oligopoly, Vertical Product Differentiation and Fixed Quality-Dependent Costs , 2010 .

[2]  Preyas S. Desai Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design? , 2001 .

[3]  David P. Myatt,et al.  Forthcoming in American Economic Review , 2022 .

[4]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[5]  Motoshige Itoh Monopoly, product differentiation and economic welfare , 1983 .

[6]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[7]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[8]  David P. Myatt,et al.  Multiproduct Cournot Oligopoly , 2005 .

[9]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Consumer-Driven Demand and Operations Management Models: A Systematic Study of Information-Technology-Enabled Sales Mechanisms , 2009 .

[10]  Panos Kouvelis,et al.  Product Design, Pricing, and Capacity Investment in a Congested Production System , 2009 .

[11]  Jesús Manuel López-Bonilla,et al.  Influence of the state-owned airlines on passenger satisfaction , 2008 .

[12]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Segmenting the market: The monopolist's optimal product mix , 1986 .

[13]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Product Design with Multiple Quality-Type Attributes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[15]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[16]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Information Goods and Vertical Differentiation , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Eric Gedajlovic,et al.  Public, private and mixed ownership and the performance of international airlines , 2002 .

[18]  Maria Valente,et al.  The Use of Single Patient Rooms vs. Multiple Occupancy Rooms in Acute Care Environments , 2003 .

[19]  G. Dobson,et al.  PRODUCT OFFERING, PRICING, AND MAKE‐TO‐STOCK/MAKE‐TO‐ORDER DECISIONS WITH SHARED CAPACITY , 2002 .

[20]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Product Line Design and Production Technology , 2007 .

[21]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Product Line Design with Component Commonality and Cost-Reduction Effort , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[22]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service , 2001 .

[23]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers , 2001, Manag. Sci..