Modularity and Intersection of “What”, “Where” and “How” Processing of Visual Stimuli: A New Method of fMRI Localization

Summary:Research on the modularity of perceptual and cognitive processes has often pointed to a ventral-dorsal distinction in cortical pathways that depend upon the nature of the stimuli and the task. However, it is not clear whether the dorsal, occipital-parietal stream specializes in locating visual objects (i.e., a “where” stream), or taking action toward objects (i.e., a “how” stream), although there is some consensus for a ventral, occipital-temporal “what” stream that specializes in the identification of visual objects. It is also not clear to what extent word and picture processing are modular along these streams, as functional imaging maps to date have not addressed the modularity question directly. Here we present two types of functional imaging maps that directly show modularity and intersection of processing function for word and picture stimuli in tasks that require decisions about “what is”, “where is”, or “how do you interact with” a stimulus (N=6 participants). Our results reveal a middle dorsal “how” stream with some modular regions of activation that are distinct from activation during “where” processing, and that words and pictures involve several modular regions of activation along these streams.

[1]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  FMRI of two measures of phonological processing in visual word recognition: Ecological validity matters , 2004, Brain and Language.

[2]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? , 2006, Psychological review.

[5]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Functional MRI activation maps from empirically defined curve fitting , 2005 .

[6]  M. Ullman A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[11]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  The Role of the Left Hemisphere in Motor Control of Touch: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[13]  C. Galletti,et al.  Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  L. Katz,et al.  Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). , 2000, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[15]  J. Moran,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1980 .

[16]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[17]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[19]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Neuroimaging of language processes: fMRI of silent and overt lexical processing and the promise of multiple process imaging in single brain studies. , 2005, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[20]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.