Discharging Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer on Home Parenteral Nutrition: Making and Implementing the Decision

Increasingly, patients with advanced ovarian cancer in bowel obstruction are receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Little is known about making and implementing the decision. This study explored the decision-making process for HPN and investigated the barriers and facilitators to implementation. This was a qualitative study underpinned by phenomenology involving 93 longitudinal in-depth interviews with 20 patients, their relatives and healthcare professionals, over 15 months. Participants were interviewed a maximum of four times. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically as per the techniques of Van Manen. We found variance between oncologists and patients regarding ownership of the HPN decision. The oncologists believed they were engaging in a shared decision-making process. However, patients felt that the decision was oncologist-driven. Nevertheless, they were content to have the treatment, when viewing the choice as either HPN or death. In implementing the decision, the principal mutable barrier to a timely discharge was communication difficulties across professional disciplines and organisations. Facilitators included developing a single point-of-contact between organisations, improving communication and implementing standardised processes. Oncologists and patients differ in their perceptions of how treatment decisions are made. Although patients are satisfied with the process, it might be beneficial for healthcare professionals to check patients’ understanding of treatment.

[1]  S. Burden,et al.  Palliative home parenteral nutrition in patients with ovarian cancer and malignant bowel obstruction: experiences of women and family caregivers , 2019, BMC Palliative Care.

[2]  G. Jayson,et al.  A remote discharge pathway for patients requiring palliative home parenteral nutrition , 2018, Clinical Nutrition.

[3]  S. Burden,et al.  Living life in the face of loss: Parenteral nutrition in ovarian cancer patients in bowel obstruction , 2018, Clinical Nutrition.

[4]  S. Burden,et al.  42 Bittersweet life in the face of loss: the experience of parenteral nutrition for women with ovarian cancer and their relatives , 2018, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[5]  S. Burden,et al.  Home parenteral nutrition for people with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  A. Ho,et al.  An exploratory study of interprofessional collaboration in end-of-life decision-making beyond palliative care settings , 2016, Journal of interprofessional care.

[7]  F. Walter,et al.  Member Checking , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[8]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Discharge planning from hospital. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Barriers to shared decisions in the most serious of cancers: a qualitative study of patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the UK , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[10]  N. Bansback,et al.  Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review. , 2015, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  A. Clarke,et al.  'Being a conduit' between hospital and home: stakeholders' views and perceptions of a nurse-led Palliative Care Discharge Facilitator Service in an acute hospital setting. , 2015, Journal of clinical nursing.

[12]  S. Culine,et al.  Home parenteral nutrition improves quality of life and nutritional status in patients with cancer: a French observational multicentre study , 2014, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[13]  A. Booth,et al.  Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work , 2013, Human Resources for Health.

[14]  D. Kansagara,et al.  “Did I Do as Best as the System Would Let Me?” Healthcare Professional Views on Hospital to Home Care Transitions , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  R. Eliakim,et al.  Home parenteral nutrition (HTPN) for incurable patients with cancer with gastrointestinal obstruction: do the benefits outweigh the risks? , 2011, Medical oncology.

[16]  M. Tully,et al.  Uncomfortable prescribing decisions in hospitals: the impact of teamwork , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[17]  Michelle O’Daniel,et al.  Professional Communication and Team Collaboration , 2008 .

[18]  D. Ciambrone,et al.  Treatment Decision-Making Among Older Women with Breast Cancer , 2006, Journal of women & aging.

[19]  W. Levinson,et al.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[20]  C. Tishelman,et al.  The path from oral nutrition to home parenteral nutrition: a qualitative interview study of the experiences of advanced cancer patients and their families. , 2004, Clinical nutrition.

[21]  S. Reeves,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: strategies and meanings , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[22]  T. Finucane How gravely ill becomes dying: a key to end-of-life care. , 1999, JAMA.

[23]  C. Charles,et al.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[24]  F. Bozzetti,et al.  ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology. , 2009, Clinical nutrition.

[25]  C. Charles,et al.  Doing Nothing is No Choice: Lay Constructions of Treatment Decision‐making Among Women with Early‐stage Breast Cancer , 1998 .