A Fuzzy Group Decision-making Model for Determining the Most Influential Persons in the Sustainable Prevention of Accidents in the Construction SMEs

Safety in the sustainable construction is a game with uncertain reality, with human’s life. Managers in power, involved in the construction project life cycle, create rules for the game and are the main players. The project’s success can be perceived differently by stakeholders. A company’s competitiveness, successful implementation of the projects and effective safety management depends on the strategic allocation of its human resources in order to select a proper project team in alignment with employee capabilities. This requires detailed factors reflecting their role (in line with their interests and attitudes) and knowing which of them has a decisive influence on the successful implementation of the project. The real data describing key factors in this concept can be provided as uncertain conditions. This work presents a novel integrated modified fuzzy group decision-making approach to select and rank the most influential persons ensuring the sustainable prevention of accidents at work in the small and medium-sized construction enterprises. This model includes the Delphi method and fuzzy extensions of Eckenrode’s criteria rating method. The proposed model could be expanded in order to select the most suitable individuals for sustainable management of safety and, moreover, for the effective implementation of safety and health measures.

[1]  Henrikas Sivilevičius,et al.  Quality Attributes And Complex Assessment Methodology of the Asphalt Mixing Plant , 2008 .

[2]  W. D. Buel,et al.  A simplification of Hay's method of recording paired comparisons. , 1960 .

[3]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[4]  Paul A Schulte,et al.  A model for occupational safety and health intervention diffusion to small businesses. , 2013, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  Yosef Jabareen,et al.  Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework , 2017 .

[6]  Hao-Tien Liu,et al.  A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry , 2012 .

[7]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry , 2018 .

[9]  Rita Gamberini,et al.  A fuzzy multi-attribute model for risk evaluation in workplaces. , 2009 .

[10]  Olga N. Aneziris,et al.  Multi-hazard multi-person quantitative occupational risk model and risk management , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  H. Leberling On finding compromise solutions in multicriteria problems using the fuzzy min-operator , 1981 .

[12]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Integrated evaluation of external wall insulation in residential buildings using SWARA-TODIM MCDM method , 2014 .

[13]  Naglis Malys,et al.  Dispersion of relative importance values contributes to the ranking uncertainty: Sensitivity analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making methods , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Molin Sun,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of the Estimated Risk in Formal Safety Assessment , 2018 .

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Sustainable Assessment of Construction Site by Applying Game The , 2010 .

[16]  Marko Gerbec,et al.  Safety change management – A new method for integrated management of organizational and technical changes , 2017 .

[17]  M. Idrees,et al.  Workers’ Age and the Impact of Psychological Factors on the Perception of Safety at Construction Sites , 2017 .

[18]  Mei-yung Leung,et al.  Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  J. Buckley The multiple judge, multiple criteria ranking problem: A fuzzy set approach , 1984 .

[20]  Aušra Stankiuviene,et al.  RISK IDENTIFICATION IN TECHNICAL REGULATION , 2008 .

[21]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Leading indicators of construction safety performance , 2013 .

[22]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  An Extended Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis with Symmetric Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets for Determining the Subjective Weights of Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems , 2018, Symmetry.

[23]  Fatih Yilmaz,et al.  Underlying Factors of Occupational Accidents: The Case of Turkey , 2016 .

[24]  C. West Churchman,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1957 .

[25]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Analyzing Occupational Risks on Construction Sites , 2017 .

[26]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[27]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Operations on fuzzy numbers via fuzzy reasoning , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[28]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to assess a stairs shape for dwelling houses , 2016 .

[29]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Assessment of Construction Site Alternatives for Non-Hazardous Waste Incineration Plant in Vilnius City, Applying ARAS-F and AHP Methods , 2012 .

[30]  G. Borg Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. , 2019, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[31]  Sergey Sinelnikov,et al.  Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance , 2015 .

[32]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Employee Sustainable Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2017 .

[33]  Peter Hasle,et al.  Small Enterprise Owners' Accident Causation Attribution and Prevention , 2009 .

[34]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Learning from accidents: interactions between human factors, technology and organisations as a central element to validate risk studies , 2017 .

[35]  Romualdas Ginevicius,et al.  A New Determining Method for the Criteria Weights in multicriteria Evaluation , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[36]  Subhashis Sahu,et al.  Fuzzy inference model for assessing occupational risks in construction sites , 2016 .

[37]  Ritoldas Šukys,et al.  Economical loss due to non-compliance with requirements for personnel safety and health in Lithuanian construction sector , 2011 .

[38]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[39]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[40]  Helen Lingard,et al.  The development and testing of a hierarchical measure of project OHS performance , 2011 .

[41]  Pin-Chao Liao,et al.  Work paradigm as a moderator between cognitive factors and behaviors – A comparison of mechanical and rebar workers , 2017 .

[42]  Terry McSween,et al.  Assessing and Preventing Serious Incidents with Behavioral Science: Enhancing Heinrich’s Triangle for the 21st Century , 2017 .

[43]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Risk Measurement and Risk Modelling using Applications of Vine Copulas , 2014 .

[44]  Alireza Ghassemi,et al.  A novel approach for risk evaluation and risk response planning in a geothermal drilling project using DEMATEL and fuzzy ANP , 2018 .

[45]  Leonard R. Sussman,et al.  Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Typologies are Misleading , 1993 .

[46]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .

[47]  Jan Stoklasa,et al.  Likert Scales in Group Multiple-criteria Evaluation , 2017, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[48]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Model for rapid assessment of vulnerability of office buildings to blast using SWARA and SMART methods (a case study of swiss re tower) , 2016 .

[49]  Mabel Barrett A comparison of the Order of Merit method and the method of Paired Comparisons. , 1914 .

[50]  E. Heermann,et al.  A comparison of six different scaling techniques. , 1960 .

[51]  Florin Gheorghe Filip,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Is Not Fuzzy: World-renowned Computer Scientist Lotfi A. Zadeh , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[52]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of Projects' performance in construction , 2014 .

[53]  Yu‐Jung Liu,et al.  Evaluation of safety performance in process industries , 2013 .

[54]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[55]  J. Morelli Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals , 2011 .

[56]  Adel Badri,et al.  Assessment of occupational health and safety performance evaluation tools: State of the art and challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises , 2018 .

[57]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block's maintenance contractors: I—Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria , 2006 .

[58]  Zhipeng Zhou,et al.  Overview and analysis of safety management studies in the construction industry , 2015 .

[59]  Oleg Kapliński,et al.  The Architect and the Paradigms of Sustainable Development: A Review of Dilemmas , 2018 .

[60]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Thermal insulation alternatives of historic brick buildings in Baltic Sea Region , 2014 .

[61]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[62]  Robert T. Eckenrode,et al.  Weighting Multiple Criteria , 1965 .

[63]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[64]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Risk assessment: What is it worth? Shall we just do away with it, or can it do a better job? , 2017 .

[65]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  An approach to multi‐attribute assessment of indoor environment before and after refurbishment of dwellings , 2009 .

[66]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria Assessment Model of Technologies , 2013 .

[67]  Bożena Hoła,et al.  Methodology of Analysing the Accident Rate in the Construction Industry , 2017 .

[68]  I. Hendry The Delphi method: Techniques and applications Edited by H. A. Linstone and M. Turoff. Pp. xx + 620. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program, Reading, Massachusetts. 1975. US $29.50; US $16.50 paper , 1976 .

[69]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of Facade's Alternatives of Commercial and Public Buildings Based on Multiple Criteria , 2011 .

[70]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.