A model for slug length distribution in gas-liquid slug flow

Abstract Intermittent, or slug flow, is a very common occurrence in gas—liquid two-phase pipe flow. Usually slug flow is an undesirable flow pattern since the existence of long lumps of liquid slugs that move at high speed is unfavorable to gas—liquid transportation. Considerable efforts have been devoted to the prediction of the slug hydrodynamic characteristics, primarily by considering an average slug length and calculating average parameters. This approach is useful, and in many cases it is adequate for many engineering calculations. There are, however, cases where this information is not sufficient and much more detailed information concerning the slug length distribution, the mean slug length and the maximum possible slug length is essential. This work presents a model that is able to calculate the slug length distribution at any desired position along the pipe. The model assumes a random distribution at the inlet of the pipe and it calculates the increase or decrease in each individual slug length, including the disappearance of the short slugs, as they move downstream. The results of the calculation show that for the fully developed slug flow the mean slug length is about 1.5 times the minimum stable slug length and the maximum length is about 3 times the minimum stable slug length.

[1]  Neima Brauner,et al.  A physical model for predicting the minimum stable slug length , 1985 .

[2]  Peter Griffith,et al.  Entrance Effects in a Two-Phase Slug Flow , 1962 .

[3]  K. Aziz,et al.  Intermittent two phase flow in horizontal pipes: Predictive models , 1978 .

[4]  Yehuda Taitel,et al.  Two-Phase Slug Flow , 1990 .

[5]  R. van Hout,et al.  SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF VOID FRACTION WITHIN A LIQUID SLUG AND SOME OTHER RELATED SLUG PARAMETERS , 1992 .

[6]  James P. Brill,et al.  Analysis of Two-Phase Tests in Large-Diameter Flow Lines in Prudhoe Bay Field , 1981 .

[7]  T. Sakaguchi,et al.  Fluctuation of Void Ratio in Two-Phase Flow : 2nd Report, Analysis of Flow Configuration Considering the Existence of Small Bubbles in Liquid Slugs , 1965 .

[8]  K. Bendiksen,et al.  The fractal statistics of liquid slug lengths , 1990 .

[9]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[10]  J. Fabre,et al.  MODELING OF TWO-PHASE SLUG FLOW , 1992 .

[11]  Neima Brauner,et al.  Holdup of the liquid slug in two phase intermittent flow , 1985 .

[12]  Moissis THE TRANSITION FROM SLUG TO HOMOGENEOUS TWO-PHASE FLOWS. Topical Report No. 1. Report No. 304 , 1963 .

[13]  Paolo Andreussi,et al.  Statistical characterization of slug flow in horizontal pipes , 1992 .

[14]  Yehuda Taitel,et al.  A model for slug frequency during gas-liquid flow in horizontal and near horizontal pipes , 1977 .

[15]  Void fraction measurements in vertical slug flow: applications to slug characteristics and transition , 1989 .

[16]  D. Dumitrescu Strömung an einer Luftblase im senkrechten Rohr , 1943 .