Image analysis methods for diffuse optical tomography.

Three major analytical tools in imaging science are summarized and demonstrated relative to optical imaging in vivo. Standard resolution testing is optimal when infinite contrast is used and hardware evaluation is the goal. However, deep tissue imaging of absorption or fluorescent contrast agents in vivo often presents a different problem, which requires contrast-detail analysis. This analysis shows that the minimum detectable sizes are in the range of 1/10 the outer diameter, whereas minimum detectable contrast values are in the range of 10 to 20% relative to the continuous background values. This is estimated for objects being in the center of the domain being imaged, and as the heterogeneous region becomes closer to the surface, the lower limit on size and contrast can become arbitrarily low and more dictated by hardware specifications. Finally, if human observer detection of abnormalities in the images is the goal, as is standard in most radiological practice, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and location receiver operating characteristic curve (LROC) are used. Each of these three major areas of image interpretation and analysis are reviewed in the context of medical imaging as well as how they are used to quantify the performance of diffuse optical imaging of tissue.

[1]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Measurement and correction of the effects of lag on contrast-detail test results in fluoroscopy. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  C. Contag,et al.  Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  Johannes-Maria Kaltenbach,et al.  Frequency- and time-domain modelling of light transport in random media , 1993, Other Conferences.

[4]  A B Thompson,et al.  Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer using fluorescence-enhanced optical tomography: phantom studies. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  A G Yodh,et al.  Detection and characterization of optical inhomogeneities with diffuse photon density waves: a signal-to-noise analysis. , 1997, Applied optics.

[6]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic and location analysis of simulated near-infrared tomography images. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  R. Swensson Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. , 1996, Medical physics.

[8]  B. Pogue,et al.  Multiwavelength three-dimensional near-infrared tomography of the breast: initial simulation, phantom, and clinical results. , 2003, Applied optics.

[9]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Comparison of Low-Contrast Detail Perception on Storage Phosphor Radiographs and Digital Flat Panel Detector Images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  S Arridge,et al.  A gradient-based optimisation scheme foroptical tomography. , 1998, Optics express.

[12]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  The value of scatter removal by a grid in full field digital mammography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  Sergio Fantini,et al.  Spatial second-derivative image processing: an application to optical mammography to enhance the detection of breast tumors. , 2003, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  B. Wilson,et al.  Absorption spectroscopy in tissue-simulating materials: a theoretical and experimental study of photon paths. , 1995, Applied optics.

[15]  Christin Wirth The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  S. R. Amtey,et al.  Contrast-detail-dose and dose efficiency analysis of a scanning digital and a screen-film-grid radiographic system. , 1981, Medical physics.

[17]  C. Contag,et al.  It's not just about anatomy: In vivo bioluminescence imaging as an eyepiece into biology , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Three-dimensional optical tomographic imaging of breast in a human subject , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  D A Benaron,et al.  Imaging transgenic animals. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  M D Duncan,et al.  Resolution limits for imaging through turbid media with diffuse light. , 1993, Optics letters.

[21]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Contrast-detail analysis characterizing diffuse optical fluorescence tomography image reconstruction. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[22]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Experimental validation of a backpropagation algorithm for three-dimensional breast tumor localization , 1999 .

[23]  L. Wagner,et al.  Analysis of variations in contrast-detail experiments. , 1984, Medical physics.

[24]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  M. Jiang,et al.  Uniqueness theorems in bioluminescence tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[26]  H. Rivas,et al.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[27]  H. G. Rylander,et al.  Use of an agent to reduce scattering in skin , 1999, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[28]  J. Swets,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic technologies. , 1979, Science.

[29]  T J Hall,et al.  Ultrasound contrast-detail analysis: a comparison of low-contrast detectability among scanhead designs. , 1995, Medical physics.

[30]  S. A. Boppart,et al.  Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[31]  S.C.W. Hyde,et al.  Depth-resolved holography through turbid media using photorefraction , 1996 .

[32]  T J Hall,et al.  Ultrasound contrast-detail analysis: a preliminary study in human observer performance. , 1993, Medical physics.

[33]  J. Patterson,et al.  Spatial resolution in fast time-resolved transillumination imaging: an indeterministic Monte Carlo approach. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  K. Zou,et al.  Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  A H Hielscher,et al.  First clinical evaluation of sagittal laser optical tomography for detection of synovitis in arthritic finger joints , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[36]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  B. Rice,et al.  Quantitative comparison of the sensitivity of detection of fluorescent and bioluminescent reporters in animal models. , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[38]  M. V. van Gemert,et al.  Light dosimetry in optical phantoms and in tissues: I. Multiple flux and transport theory. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  B. Pogue,et al.  Near-infrared (NIR) tomography breast image reconstruction with a priori structural information from MRI: algorithm development for reconstructing heterogeneities , 2003 .

[40]  B. Pogue,et al.  Three-dimensional optical tomography: resolution in small-object imaging. , 2003, Applied optics.

[41]  B. Wilson,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. I. Model predictions and comparison with diffusion theory , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  X Liu,et al.  Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study. , 2001, Medical physics.

[43]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. , 2002, Radiology.

[44]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Inverse Methods for Optical Tomography , 1993, IPMI.

[45]  J. Ripoll,et al.  Visualization of antitumor treatment by means of fluorescence molecular tomography with an annexin V-Cy5.5 conjugate. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  H Lopez,et al.  A clinical evaluation of contrast-detail analysis for ultrasound images. , 1990, Medical physics.

[47]  L L Fajardo,et al.  Contrast-detail detectability analysis: comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[48]  D. Delpy,et al.  Optical Imaging in Medicine , 1998, CLEO/Europe Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.

[49]  D J Goodenough,et al.  Factors related to low contrast resolution in CT scanners. , 1984, Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society.

[50]  B. Pogue,et al.  Imaging breast adipose and fibroglandular tissue molecular signatures by using hybrid MRI-guided near-infrared spectral tomography. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  G C Weatherburn,et al.  Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[52]  C E Ravin,et al.  Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy. , 2001, Radiology.

[53]  D T Delpy,et al.  Evaluation of spatial resolution as a function of thickness for time-resolved optical imaging of highly scattering media. , 1997, Medical physics.

[54]  E. Likaki,et al.  Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms , 2003, European Radiology.

[55]  Jenghwa Chang,et al.  Luminescence optical tomography of dense scattering media. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[56]  C J Kotre,et al.  An alternative approach to contrast-detail testing of X-ray image intensifier systems. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[57]  H Lopez,et al.  New contrast-detail phantoms for improved precision in lesion detection measurements. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[58]  Dev Chakraborty,et al.  Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[59]  M. Schweiger,et al.  Image reconstruction in optical tomography. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[60]  H Lopez,et al.  Frequency independent ultrasound contrast-detail analysis. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[61]  B. Pogue,et al.  Automated region detection based on the contrast-to-noise ratio in near-infrared tomography. , 2004, Applied optics.

[62]  B. Pogue,et al.  Near-Infrared Characterization of Breast Tumors In Vivo using Spectrally-Constrained Reconstruction , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[63]  B. Pogue,et al.  Spatially variant regularization improves diffuse optical tomography. , 1999, Applied optics.

[64]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Experimental fluorescence tomography of tissues with noncontact measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[65]  M. Huang,et al.  Utilizing optical tomography with ultrasound localization to image heterogeneous hemoglobin distribution in large breast cancers. , 2005, Neoplasia.

[66]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Enhanced frequency-domain optical image reconstruction in tissues through total-variation minimization. , 1996, Applied optics.

[67]  J. Ripoll,et al.  Experimental determination of photon propagation in highly absorbing and scattering media. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[68]  K.,et al.  Frequency-domain optical mammography: edge effect corrections. , 1996, Medical physics.

[69]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Targeting in photodynamic therapy and photo-imaging , 2003 .

[70]  R Esposito,et al.  Depth dependence of the analytical expression for the width of the point spread function (spatial resolution) in time-resolved transillumination. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[71]  C E Hooper,et al.  CCD imaging of luciferase gene expression in single mammalian cells. , 1990, Journal of bioluminescence and chemiluminescence.

[72]  S. W. Smith,et al.  A contrast-detail analysis of diagnostic ultrasound imaging. , 1982, Medical physics.

[73]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[74]  R. Cubeddu,et al.  Optical Tomography , 1998, Technical Digest. 1998 EQEC. European Quantum Electronics Conference (Cat. No.98TH8326).

[75]  Daniel C Sullivan,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for In Vivo Imaging in Oncology , 2002, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[76]  S. Arridge,et al.  Optical imaging in medicine: II. Modelling and reconstruction , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[77]  N. Chen,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of absorption and scattering maps with ultrasound localization: feasibility study using transmission geometry. , 2003, Applied optics.

[78]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Objective Assessment of Image Quality , 2005 .

[80]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Approximation of Mie scattering parameters in near-infrared tomography of normal breast tissue in vivo. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[81]  S. Arridge,et al.  Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement , 1988 .

[82]  B. Pogue,et al.  Quantitative hemoglobin tomography with diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: pilot results in the breast. , 2001, Radiology.

[83]  A R Cowen,et al.  Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector. , 2001, Medical physics.

[84]  D. A. BOAStt,et al.  Scattering of diffuse photon density waves by spherical inhomogeneities within turbid media: Analytic solution and applications , 2022 .

[85]  Jessica C Ramella-Roman,et al.  Imaging skin pathology with polarized light. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[86]  Jaroslaw Harezlak,et al.  Comparison of bandwidth selection methods for kernel smoothing of ROC curves , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[87]  J. Tsuruda,et al.  MR detection of intracranial calcification: a phantom study. , 1987, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[88]  E Gratton,et al.  Propagation of photon-density waves in strongly scattering media containing an absorbing semi-infinite plane bounded by a straight edge. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[89]  B. Pogue,et al.  Combining near-infrared tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to study in vivo breast tissue: implementation of a Laplacian-type regularization to incorporate magnetic resonance structure. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[90]  W. Star,et al.  Light dosimetry in vivo. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[91]  L. O. Svaasand,et al.  Properties of photon density waves in multiple-scattering media. , 1993, Applied optics.

[92]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  Three-dimensional diffuse optical tomography in the parallel plane transmission geometry: evaluation of a hybrid frequency domain/continuous wave clinical system for breast imaging. , 2003, Medical physics.

[93]  H.J.C.M. Sterenborg,et al.  Skin optics , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[94]  B Chance,et al.  Near-infrared optical imaging of tissue phantoms with measurement in the change of optical path lengths. , 1994, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[95]  L Wang,et al.  MCML--Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues. , 1995, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[96]  N. Chen,et al.  Portable near-infrared diffusive light imager for breast cancer detection. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[97]  D T Delpy,et al.  Measurement of tissue temporal point spread function (TPSF) by use of a gain-modulated avalanche photodiode detector. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[98]  Randall L. Barbour,et al.  A perturbation approach for optical diffusion tomography using continuous-wave and time-resolved data , 1993, Other Conferences.

[99]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Contrast-detail analysis for detection and characterization with near-infrared diffuse tomography. , 2000, Medical physics.

[100]  F. Mettler,et al.  ROC and contrast detail image evaluation tests compared. , 1985, Radiology.

[101]  B. Pogue,et al.  Optical image reconstruction using frequency-domain data: simulations and experiments , 1996 .

[102]  Harry L. Graber,et al.  Optical imaging of anatomical maps derived from magnetic resonance images using time-independent optical sources , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[103]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Focus Issue: Tomographic Image Reconstruction , 1998 .

[104]  B. Pogue,et al.  Comparison of imaging geometries for diffuse optical tomography of tissue. , 1999, Optics express.

[105]  Hua-bei Jiang,et al.  Three-dimensional diffuse optical tomography of bones and joints. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[106]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Contrast, resolution, and detectability in MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[107]  G. Cohen,et al.  Contrast‐Detail‐Dose Analysis of Six Different Computed Tomographic Scanners , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[108]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Fluorescence imaging with near-infrared light: new technological advances that enable in vivo molecular imaging , 2002, European Radiology.

[109]  M J Tapiovaara Efficiency of low-contrast detail detectability in fluoroscopic imaging. , 1997, Medical physics.

[110]  Jennifer J. Gibson,et al.  Electromagnetic breast imaging: results of a pilot study in women with abnormal mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[111]  Matthew P. Nelson,et al.  Raman chemical imaging of breast tissue , 1997 .

[112]  K. Paulsen,et al.  High-resolution near-infrared tomographic imaging simulations of the rat cranium by use of a priori magnetic resonance imaging structural information. , 1998, Optics letters.

[113]  S. Jacques,et al.  Optimized radial and angular positions in Monte Carlo modeling. , 1994, Medical physics.

[114]  K. Faulkner,et al.  Contrast-detail assessment of computed tomography scanners. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[115]  J. Boone,et al.  An analytical edge spread function model for computer fitting and subsequent calculation of the LSF and MTF. , 1994, Medical physics.

[116]  A. K. L. Dymoke-Bradshaw,et al.  High resolution time-domain fluorescence lifetime imaging for biomedical applications , 1999 .

[117]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis , 2002, European Radiology.

[118]  M J Eppstein,et al.  Biomedical optical tomography using dynamic parameterization and bayesian conditioning on photon migration measurements. , 1999, Applied optics.

[119]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  IMAGING SCATTERING MEDIA FROM A DISTANCE: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS OF NONCONTACT OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY , 2004 .

[120]  F Fischbach,et al.  Comparison of indirect CsI/a:Si and direct a:Se digital radiography. An assessment of contrast and detail visualization. , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[121]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[122]  F A DiBianca,et al.  The Use of Contrast‐Detail‐Dose Evaluation of Image Quality in a Computed Tomographic Scanner , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[123]  Michael S. Patterson,et al.  Computer simulation and experimental studies of optical imaging with photon density waves , 1993, Other Conferences.

[124]  Brian Pogue,et al.  Quantitative fluorescence lifetime spectroscopy in turbid media: comparison of theoretical, experimental and computational methods. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[125]  J. Swets Sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic tests. , 1982, JAMA.

[126]  R Nossal,et al.  Resolution limits for optical transillumination of abnormalities deeply embedded in tissues. , 1994, Medical physics.

[127]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Fluorescence molecular tomography resolves protease activity in vivo , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[128]  E. Sevick-Muraca Computations of time-dependent photon migration for biomedical optical imaging. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[129]  Markus Völk,et al.  Evaluation of Lossy Data Compression of Chest X-Rays: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Study , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[130]  Z. F. Lu,et al.  Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast‐detail phantom , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[131]  C. L. Hutchinson,et al.  Fluorescence and Absorption Contrast Mechanisms for Biomedical Optical Imaging Using Frequency‐Domain Techniques , 1997, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[132]  R. Arridget,et al.  The theoretical basis for the determination of optical pathlengths in tissue: temporal and frequency analysis , 1992 .

[133]  M. Eppstein,et al.  Detection of single and multiple targets in tissue phantoms with fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging: feasibility study. , 2005, Radiology.

[134]  W. M. Star Comparing the P3-approximation with diffusion theory and with Monte Carlo calculations of light propagation in a slab geometry , 1989, Other Conferences.

[135]  Ashleyj . Welch,et al.  Optical-Thermal Response of Laser-Irradiated Tissue , 1995 .

[136]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of optical absorption and scattering maps in turbid media from near-infrared frequency-domain data. , 1995, Optics letters.