Comparison of health problems related to work and environmental measurements in two office buildings with different ventilation systems.

A cross sectional survey investigating "building sickness" was carried out in two buildings with similar populations of office workers but differing ventilation systems, one being fully air conditioned with humidification and the other naturally ventilated. The prevalence of symptoms related to work was assessed by a questionnaire administered by a doctor. A stratified, randomly selected sample of workers was seen (84% response). Building sickness includes several distinct syndromes related to work, most of which were significantly more common in the air conditioned building than the naturally ventilated building--namely, rhinitis (28% v 5%), nasal blockage and dry throat (35% v 9%), lethargy (36% v 13%), and headache (31% v 15%). The prevalence of work related asthma and humidifier fever was low and did not differ significantly between the two buildings. An environmental assessment of the offices was performed to attempt to identify possible factors responsible for the differences in the prevalence of disease. Globe temperature, dry bulb temperature, relative humidity, moisture content, air velocity, positive and negative ions, and carbon monoxide, ozone, and formaldehyde concentrations were all measured. None of these factors differed between the buildings, suggesting that building sickness is caused by other factors.

[1]  E. S. Tan.  Epidemic hysteria. , 1979, British medical journal.

[2]  L. H. Hawkins.  The influence of air ions, temperature and humidity on subjective wellbeing and comfort , 1981 .

[3]  P. Burge,et al.  Occupational asthma in a factory with a contaminated humidifier. , 1985, Thorax.

[4]  E. Grandjean.  Ergonomics and health in modern offices , 1984 .

[5]  M. Key.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; occupational exposure to inorganic lead: request for comments and information; republication--NIOSH. Request for comments and information relevant to occupational exposure to inorganic lead. , 1997, Federal register.

[6]  C A Pickering,et al.  The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. , 1984, British medical journal.

[7]  John W. Cherrie,et al.  Monitoring for Health Hazards at Work , 1982 .

[8]  Thomas Bedford,et al.  Bedford's basic principles of ventilation and heating. , 1975 .

[9]  T D Sterling,et al.  Building Illness in the White-Collar Workplace , 1983, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[10]  T Sterling,et al.  The impact of different ventilation levels and fluorescent lighting types on building illness: an experimental study. , 1983, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[11]  A. Hedge,et al.  Air ionization: an evaluation of its physiological and psychological effects. , 1982, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  T Sterling,et al.  New health hazards in sealed buildings. , 1983, AIA journal. American Institute of Architects.

[13]  W. Solomon.  Fungus aerosols arising from cold-mist vaporizers. , 1974, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  P. Breysse.  The health cost of 'tight' homes. , 1981, JAMA.

[15]  R. A. Young,et al.  The effects of reduced ventilation on indoor air quality in an office building , 1983 .

[16]  J. Edwards,et al.  Humidifier Fever , 1982, Royal Society of Health journal.