From science to policy through transdisciplinary research

Abstract Is transdisciplinary research a useful means of bridging science and policy? And does transdisciplinarity go beyond informing public agencies, the private sector, or civil society of the results of research? The interacting policy cultures serve as a framework for studying transdisciplinary projects funded by two environmental research programs, the Swiss Priority Program Environment (SPPE) and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA). Two types of projects are distinguished. Researchers in projects of the first type reorganize knowledge according to the (perceived) interest of the audience. Transdisciplinary research of this type requires a clearly defined audience culture. Researchers in projects of the second type initiate a co-production of knowledge during which the different policy cultures interact. Transdisciplinary research of type two is appropriate for policies that have to be developed using a collective process involving multiple policy cultures.

[1]  B. Truffer Knowledge Integration in Transdisciplinary Research Projects – The Importance of Reflexive Interface Management Wissensintegration in transdisziplinären Projekten – Flexibles Rollenverständnis als Schl?sselkompetenz für das Schnittstellenmanagement , 2007 .

[2]  B. Truffer Wissensintegration in transdisziplinären Projekten. Flexibles Rollenverständnis als Schlüsselkompetenz für das Schnittstellenmanagement , 2007 .

[3]  A. Giri The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity , 2002 .

[4]  U. Flick Handbuch qualitative Sozialforschung , 2010 .

[5]  M. Loibl Integrating Perspectives in the Practice of Transdisciplinary Research , 2006 .

[6]  David H. Guston,et al.  Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making: Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization , 2001 .

[7]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis , 1979 .

[8]  D. Guston Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[9]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research , 2007 .

[10]  John Stone,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 2007 .

[11]  Andrew Jamison,et al.  Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology , 1995 .

[12]  R. Scholz,et al.  Transdisciplinarity : joint problem solving among science, technology, and society : an effective way for managing complexity , 2001 .

[13]  Maximilian Weber Gesammelte Aufsatze Zur Wissenschaftslehre , 2009 .

[14]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[15]  David H. Guston,et al.  Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: , 1999, Social studies of science.

[16]  T. Cockerell Internationalism and Science , 1932, Nature.

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[18]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA , 1992, Osiris.

[19]  Maximilian Weber,et al.  Die "Objektivität" sozialwissenschaftlicher undsozialpolitischer Erkenntnis , 1904 .

[20]  S. Jasanoff NGOs and the environment: From knowledge to action , 1997 .

[21]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Transdisciplinary research: Heralding a "new deal" between science and society? , 2007 .

[22]  J. Mittelstraß Auf dem Wege zur Transdisziplinarität , 1992 .

[23]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[24]  Inter and Transdisciplinary Processes — Experience and Lessons Learnt , 2001 .

[25]  Heinz Gutscher,et al.  Changing Things — Moving People , 2001 .

[26]  T. Clark The policy process : a practical guide for natural resource professionals , 2002 .

[27]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[28]  C. Pohl,et al.  Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research , 2006 .

[29]  Franz Höchtl,et al.  Pure theory or useful tool?: Experiences with transdisciplinarity in the Piedmont Alps , 2006 .

[30]  Clark A. Miller Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[31]  Clair Gough,et al.  Integrated Assessment: an emerging methodology for complex issues , 1998 .

[32]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[33]  Ruth Kaufmann-Hayoz,et al.  Changing things - moving people : strategies for promoting sustainable development at the local level , 2001 .

[34]  J. Wachelder Democratizing Science: Various Routes and Visions of Dutch Science Shops , 2003 .

[35]  Rolf Lidskog,et al.  Science and policy in air pollution abatement strategies , 2002 .

[36]  David Policansky,et al.  SCIENCE AND DECISION MAKING FOR WATER RESOURCES , 1998 .

[37]  G. Brewer,et al.  The theory and practice of interdisciplinary work , 1999 .

[38]  C. Pohl,et al.  Principles for designing transdisciplinary research : proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences , 2007 .

[39]  Garry D. Brewer,et al.  The challenges of interdisciplinarity , 1999 .

[40]  Aaron Wildavsky Speaking Truth to Power , 1987 .

[41]  Alex Farrell,et al.  Environmental assessments: four under-appreciated elements of design , 2001 .

[42]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[43]  E. Jantsch,et al.  Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation , 1972 .

[44]  C. Limoges Expert knowledge and decision-making in controversy contexts , 1993 .

[45]  J.-P. Voß,et al.  Nachhaltigkeitsforschung – jenseits von Disziplinierung und anything goes , 2004 .

[46]  J. Voss,et al.  Reflexive governance for sustainable development , 2006 .

[47]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[48]  Christian Pohl,et al.  Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research , 2005 .

[49]  D. Price The Scientific Estate , 1966, Nature.

[50]  T. Quinlan,et al.  Why bio-physical and social scientists can speak the same language when addressing Sustainable Development , 2004 .

[51]  T. Gieryn,et al.  Boundaries of Science , 1995 .

[52]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.