Clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in multiple system atrophy

OBJECTIVES To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of a selection of abnormal findings in the putamen and infratentorial structures on routine magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between multiple system atrophy, idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, and age matched controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two neuroradiologists blindly and independently rated axial T2 weighted and proton density MRI of 44 patients with multiple system atrophy, 47 patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, and 45 controls. High field (1.5 T) scans were available in 16 patients with multiple system atrophy, 15 patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, and 16 controls. All other patients had 0.5 T scans. RESULTS On both 0.5 and 1.5 T scans the following items had high specificity but low sensitivity: putaminal atrophy, a hyperintense putaminal rim, and infratentorial signal change. Finding any infratentorial abnormality gave higher sensitivity but lower specificity. Putaminal isointensity or hypointensity relative to globus pallidus, absolute putaminal hypointensity, and altered size of the olives were not useful discriminators. The overall sensitivity was 73% on 0.5 T and 88% on 1.5 T scans. The specificities of these findings for multiple system atrophy in comparison to idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and controls on 0.5 T were 95% and 100% respectively, and on 1.5 T were 93% and 91% respectively. Finding any of the described abnormalities on MRI gave a positive predictive value of 93% on the 0.5 T machine, and 85% on the 1.5 T scanner.

[1]  J. Sung,et al.  Striatonigral degeneration , 1990, Neurology.

[2]  A. Lees,et al.  What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson's disease , 1992, Neurology.

[3]  G Di Chiro,et al.  Multiple system atrophy (Shy-Drager syndrome): MR imaging. , 1986, Radiology.

[4]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Multiple system atrophy : natural history , MRI morphology , and dopamine receptor imaging with 123 IBZM-SPECT , 2022 .

[5]  N. Quinn,et al.  Multiple system atrophy--the nature of the beast. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  G A Johnson,et al.  Parkinson plus syndrome: diagnosis using high field MR imaging of brain iron. , 1986, Radiology.

[7]  R I Grossman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonian syndromes , 1989, Neurology.

[8]  R A Zimmerman,et al.  Olivopontocerebellar atrophy: MR diagnosis and relationship to multisystem atrophy. , 1990, Radiology.

[9]  Hemi-parkinsonism in multiple system atrophy: a PET and MRI study , 1992, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[11]  P. Boesiger,et al.  T2 relaxation time in patients with Parkinson's disease , 1993, Neurology.

[12]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Multiple system atrophy: natural history, MRI morphology, and dopamine receptor imaging with 123IBZM-SPECT. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  Y. Hashizume,et al.  A study of parkinsonism in multiple system atrophy: clinical and MRI correlation , 1994, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[14]  B. Kendall,et al.  Is cranial computerized tomography useful in the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? , 1994, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[15]  E. Mukai,et al.  [Magnetic resonance imaging of parkinsonism]. , 1989, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[16]  M Konagaya,et al.  Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study of extrapyramidal symptoms in multiple system atrophy. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.