Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study

Abstract Background: Radiomic analyses of CT images provide prognostic information that can potentially be used for personalized treatment. However, heterogeneity of acquisition- and reconstruction protocols influences robustness of radiomic analyses. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different CT-scanners, slice thicknesses, exposures and gray-level discretization on radiomic feature values and their stability. Material and methods: A texture phantom with ten different inserts was scanned on nine different CT-scanners with varying tube currents. Scans were reconstructed with 1.5 mm or 3 mm slice thickness. Image pre-processing comprised gray-level discretization in ten different bin widths ranging from 5 to 50 HU and different resampling methods (i.e., linear, cubic and nearest neighbor interpolation to 1 × 1 × 3 mm3 voxels) were investigated. Subsequently, 114 textural radiomic features were extracted from a 2.1 cm3 sphere in the center of each insert. The influence of slice thickness, exposure and bin width on feature values was investigated. Feature stability was assessed by calculating the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) in a test-retest setting and for different combinations of scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses. Results: Bin width influenced feature values, but this only had a marginal effect on the total number of stable features (CCC > 0.85) when comparing different scanners, slice thicknesses or exposures. Most radiomic features were affected by slice thickness, but this effect could be reduced by resampling the CT-images before feature extraction. Statistics feature ‘energy’ was the most dependent on slice thickness. No clear correlation between feature values and exposures was observed. Conclusions: CT-scanner, slice thickness and bin width affected radiomic feature values, whereas no effect of exposure was observed. Optimization of gray-level discretization to potentially improve prognostic value can be performed without compromising feature stability. Resampling images prior to feature extraction decreases the variability of radiomic features.

[1]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[2]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[3]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[4]  Samuel H. Hawkins,et al.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[5]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[6]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[7]  P. Lambin,et al.  CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Shao Hui Huang,et al.  External validation of a prognostic CT-based radiomic signature in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[9]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[10]  W. Tsai,et al.  Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Radiomics applied to lung cancer: a review , 2016 .

[12]  Jiazhou Wang,et al.  Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? , 2016, Tomography.

[13]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing Agreement between Radiomic Features Computed for Multiple CT Imaging Settings , 2016, PloS one.

[14]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Quantitative radiomics studies for tissue characterization: a review of technology and methodological procedures , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  Carsten Brink,et al.  Survival prediction of non-small cell lung cancer patients using radiomics analyses of cone-beam CT images. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels , 2017, Medical physics.

[17]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Radiomics-based Prognosis Analysis for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  P. Lambin,et al.  Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.