Periimplant Histology and Cytokine Pattern in Metal-Allergic Knee Arthroplasty Patients with Improvement After Revision with Hypoallergenic Materials

In knee arthroplasty patients with complications not explained by classical mechanisms, like infection or malalignment/malposition, the role of hypersensitivity to implant materials may be questioned. In 10 such patients with and 5 without metal sensitization, a combined evaluation of periimplant histology and cytokine expression, and microbiological analysis was done. In the 10 metal allergics, outcome after revision with alternative “hypoallergenic” materials (9×titanium-based, 1×oxinium-based) was evaluated. In the metal-allergic patients, scattered, partly dense T-lymphocytes were seen in periimplant tissue and there were no signs of infection. Predominant IFN-γ expression and the improvement in the postoperative WOMAC scores (mean preoperative score, 40.4; postoperative score, 55.58) supported hypersensitivity as the symptoms elicitor.

[1]  T. Gehrke,et al.  [Joint endoprosthesis pathology. Histopathological diagnostics and classification]. , 2011, Der Pathologe.

[2]  Joanne B. Adams,et al.  Perivascular Lymphocytic Infiltration Is Not Limited to Metal-on-Metal Bearings , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  T. Joyce,et al.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  T. Ruzicka,et al.  Nickel (Ni) allergic patients with complications to Ni containing joint replacement show preferential IL‐17 type reactivity to Ni , 2010, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  F. Nestle,et al.  Increased metal allergy in patients with failed metal‐on‐metal hip arthroplasty and peri‐implant T‐lymphocytic inflammation , 2009, Allergy.

[6]  W. Jiranek,et al.  Metal hypersensitivity: can it mimic infection? , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  J. Ring,et al.  [Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies. Joint statement by the Implant Allergy Working Group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German Association of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery), DKG (German Contact Dermatitis Research Group) and DGAKI (German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology)]. , 2008, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[8]  J. Ring,et al.  [Orthopedic surgical implants and allergies: joint statement by the implant allergy working group (AK 20) of the DGOOC (German association of orthopedics and orthopedic surgery), DKG (German contact dermatitis research group) and dgaki (German society for allergology and clinical immunology)]. , 2008, Der Orthopade.

[9]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Orthopädisch-chirurgische Implantate und Allergien , 2007, Der Orthopäde.

[10]  N. Baldini,et al.  Sensitivity to implant materials in patients undergoing total hip replacement. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[11]  T. Glant,et al.  Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P. Campbell,et al.  An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  H. Wichmann,et al.  Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults , 2001, Allergy.

[15]  J. S. Taylor,et al.  Cutaneous complications of orthopedic implants. A two-year prospective study. , 1981, Archives of dermatology.