The Brain Gauge: a novel tool for assessing brain health

Background. A large number of neurological disorders (neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental or trauma induced) are difficult to diagnose or assess, thus limiting treatment efficacy.  Existing solutions and products for this need are costly, extremely slow, often invasive, and in many cases fail to definitively (and quantitatively) diagnose or assess treatment.  Advances. For the past decade, we have been developing what we consider to be an innovative low-cost sensory testing device (the Brain Gauge) that non-invasively assesses the central nervous system (CNS).  The objective has been to develop an inexpensive, highly accurate, simple to use device to assess brain health in all environments: in the clinic, at home, at work, on the battlefield or sports field.  The device is non-invasive, generates no harmful radiation, requires no chemicals nor exposure to dangerous substances.  The device does not require expensive disposables and does not involve the use of samples that require physical processing in a central laboratory.  Tests can be administered in a matter of minutes and do not require expert oversight.  The most recent versions of the technology are easily portable; the device is the size and shape of a computer mouse.  As such, the technology is particularly well suited to non-drug, non-radiation based alternative and in-home care.  The device and methods have been used in numerous studies of neurological cohorts that are often considered difficult to diagnose or assess objectively. Based on over a decade of studies (currently an ontological database of over 10,000 subjects and over 60 peer reviewed publications), the system can be used to enable clinicians to have a much better view of a patient’s CNS health status.  The diagnostic system delivers a battery of sensory based (tactile) tests that are conducted rapidly – much like an eye exam with verbal feedback – and the tests were  designed to be predominantly impacted by specific mechanisms of CNS information processing.  Because of the broad diversity of the questions addressed by the different metrics, combining the metrics allows for the generation of a unique individual CNS profile that appears to be very sensitive to neurological status. Outlook.  A review of the development of the system and the application of the method in basic and clinical research is provided to give readers an insight into why the methods were developed, how the methods work and what the methods can be optimally utilized for. The methods provide an objective means for clinicians and researchers to track brain health, and examples of case studies of tracking recovery from concussion as well as response to treatments are provided.

[1]  Eric M. Francisco,et al.  Altered Central Sensitization in Subgroups of Women With Vulvodynia , 2011, The Clinical journal of pain.

[2]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Effects of stimulus-driven synchronization on sensory perception , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[3]  V. Mountcastle Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Eric M. Francisco,et al.  Percept of the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus is altered by changing its amplitude , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[5]  An undergraduate laboratory exercise to study sensory inhibition. , 2013, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[6]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Neurosensory Assessments of Concussion. , 2016, Military medicine.

[7]  P. Hume,et al.  Use of the Brain-Gauge Somatosensory Assessment for Monitoring Recovery from Concussion: A Case Study , 2018 .

[8]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Absence of stimulus-driven synchronization effects on sensory perception in autism: Evidence for local underconnectivity? , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[9]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Ipsilateral Input Modifies the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Response to Contralateral Skin Flutter , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Centrally-mediated sensory information processing is impacted with increased alcohol consumption in college-aged individuals , 2013, Brain Research.

[11]  Robert M. Friedman,et al.  Area-specific representation of mechanical nociceptive stimuli within SI cortex of squirrel monkeys , 2009, PAIN.

[12]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Quantification of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury via Cortical Metrics: Analytical Methods. , 2019, Military medicine.

[13]  G. Baranek,et al.  Perceptual metrics of individuals with autism provide evidence for disinhibition , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[14]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Tactile processing in children and adolescents with obsessive–compulsive disorder , 2015, Somatosensory & motor research.

[15]  V. Tannan,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation fails to enhance spatial localization in adults with autism , 2007, Brain Research.

[16]  V. Napadow,et al.  Functional deficits in carpal tunnel syndrome reflect reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Continuous theta-burst rTMS over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile perception on the hand , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Optical imaging of intrinsic signals in somatosensory cortex , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  V. Tannan,et al.  A novel device for delivering two-site vibrotactile stimuli to the skin , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Impaired tactile processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  V. Tannan,et al.  A portable tactile sensory diagnostic device , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  E. Francisco,et al.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber’s Law , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  F. Donders On the speed of mental processes. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Role of Feed-Forward Inhibition in Neocortical Information Processing: Implications for Neurological Disorders , 2017 .

[25]  A. Mayer,et al.  What is the physiological time to recovery after concussion? A systematic review , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[26]  Barry L. Whitsel,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization , 2006, Brain Research.

[27]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Dynamic representations of the somatosensory cortex , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  Allen K. Sills,et al.  Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[29]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Title: Reduced Gabaergic Inhibition and Abnormal Sensory Symptoms in Children with Tourette Syndrome Running Head: Abnormal Gaba Levels and Sensory Processing in Ts Submitted for the Steven Hsiao Special Issue Nicolaas Puts, Phd Author Contributions Introduction , 2022 .

[30]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli , 2007, Brain Research.

[31]  Eric M. Francisco,et al.  Somatosensory Information Processing in the Aging Population , 2011, Front. Ag. Neurosci.

[32]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Neurosensory assessments of migraine , 2013, Brain Research.

[33]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Minicolumnar activation patterns in cat and monkey SI cortex. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Altered tactile sensitivity in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  W. Cole,et al.  Intraindividual Cognitive Variability: An Examination of ANAM4 TBI-MIL Simple Reaction Time Data from Service Members with and without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2017, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[36]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Duration-dependent response of SI to vibrotactile stimulation in squirrel monkey. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  The Role of Attention in Somatosensory Processing: A Multi-trait, Multi-method Analysis , 2016, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[38]  J. Merkel Die zeitlichen Verhältnisse der Willensthätigkeit , 1883 .

[39]  V. Tannan,et al.  Effects of the N-methyl-D-Aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on vibrotactile adaptation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Tommerdahl,et al.  Neurophysiology of Tactile Perception : A Tribute to Steven Hsiao Metaplasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex : effects on physiology and tactile perception , 2016 .

[42]  R. S. Waters,et al.  Hand-to-Face Remapping But No Differences in Temporal Discrimination Observed on the Intact Hand Following Unilateral Upper Limb Amputation , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[43]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Anterior parietal cortical response to tactile and skin-heating stimuli applied to the same skin site. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Response of anterior parietal cortex to different modes of same-site skin stimulation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  S. Mostofsky,et al.  A vibrotactile behavioral battery for investigating somatosensory processing in children and adults , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  Zheng Zhang,et al.  A novel device for the study of somatosensory information processing , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[47]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Role of primary somatosensory cortex in the coding of pain , 2013, PAIN®.

[48]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  A quantitative method for determining spatial discriminative capacity , 2008, Biomedical engineering online.

[49]  E. P. Gardner,et al.  Sensory funneling. II. Cortical neuronal representation of patterned cutaneous stimuli. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Amplitude-dependency of response of SI cortex to flutter stimulation , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.