Near-optimal induced universal graphs for cycles and paths

Abstract A graph U is an induced universal graph for a family F of graphs if every graph in F is a vertex-induced subgraph of U . Recently, for the family of all undirected graphs on n vertices, Alon [Geom. Funct. Anal. 2017] [3] proved the existence of an induced universal graph with ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) ⋅ 2 ( n − 1 ) ∕ 2 vertices improving the previous best bound of 16 ⋅ 2 n ∕ 2 by Alstrup et al. (2015) and matching the lower bound of 2 ( n − 1 ) ∕ 2 by Moon (1965) up to lower order additive terms. We continue this line of research of finding the size of the smallest induced universal graph up to lower order additive terms for some basic graph families. For the family of graphs with n vertices and bounded degree D = O ( 1 ) , Alon and Nenadov [Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2017] [4] showed that the smallest induced universal graph has size Θ n D ∕ 2 , but it remains to find the constant hidden in the O -notation. For even D the bound O n D ∕ 2 was already shown by Butler (2009). In order to find the correct constants for general D > 0 , it is natural first to consider the case D = 2 . For D = 2 , Butler gave an induced universal graph of size 6 . 5 n and subsequently, Esperet et al. (2008) found an induced universal graph for D = 2 of size 2 . 5 n . We construct for D = 2 an even smaller induced universal graph with 2 n − 1 vertices. This proves a conjecture by Esperet et al. stating the existence of such a graph with 2 n + o ( n ) vertices. For the family of acyclic graphs on n vertices with maximum degree 2 we show that the smallest induced universal graph has size  3 n 2 . We also introduce the notion of size oblivious and size aware decoding, and relate this to families of induced universal graphs. For the family of graphs consisting of a single cycle we prove new upper and lower bounds on the complexity of size aware and size oblivious decoders. These new bounds separate the two notions.

[1]  Steve Butler,et al.  Induced-Universal Graphs for Graphs with Bounded Maximum Degree , 2009, Graphs Comb..

[2]  Mikkel Thorup,et al.  Approximate distance oracles , 2005, J. ACM.

[3]  Mathias Bæk Tejs Knudsen,et al.  Optimal Induced Universal Graphs and Adjacency Labeling for Trees , 2015, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[4]  Moni Naor,et al.  Implicit Representation of Graphs , 1992, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[5]  J. Moon Topics on tournaments , 1968 .

[6]  Brendan D. McKay,et al.  Asymptotic Enumeration by Degree Sequence of Graphs of High Degree , 1990, Eur. J. Comb..

[7]  Arnaud Labourel,et al.  On induced-universal graphs for the class of bounded-degree graphs , 2008, Inf. Process. Lett..

[8]  Gábor Rudolf,et al.  Minimal Universal Bipartite Graphs , 2007, Ars Comb..

[9]  David Peleg,et al.  Compact and localized distributed data structures , 2003, Distributed Computing.

[10]  Amos Korman,et al.  Labeling schemes for vertex connectivity , 2007, TALG.

[11]  Cyril Gavoille,et al.  Shorter Implicit Representation for Planar Graphs and Bounded Treewidth Graphs , 2007, ESA.

[12]  David Peleg,et al.  Labeling schemes for weighted dynamic trees , 2007, Inf. Comput..

[13]  Edith Cohen,et al.  Labeling Dynamic XML Trees , 2010, SIAM J. Comput..

[14]  Lenore Cowen,et al.  Compact routing with minimum stretch , 1999, SODA '99.

[15]  F. Chung Universal graphs and induced-universal graphs , 1990 .

[16]  David Peleg,et al.  Compact routing schemes with low stretch factor , 2003, J. Algorithms.

[17]  Brendan D. McKay,et al.  Asymptotic enumeration by degree sequence of graphs with degreeso(n1/2) , 1991, Comb..

[18]  J. Moon,et al.  On minimal n-universal graphs , 1965, Proceedings of the Glasgow Mathematical Association.

[19]  Noga Alon,et al.  Optimal induced universal graphs for bounded-degree graphs , 2016, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  Noga Alon,et al.  Asymptotically optimal induced universal graphs , 2017 .