A new multi-layer approach for progressive damage simulation in composite laminates based on isogeometric analysis and Kirchhoff–Love shells. Part II: impact modeling

In this two-part paper we introduce a new formulation for modeling progressive damage in laminated composite structures. We adopt a multi-layer modeling approach, based on isogeometric analysis, where each ply or lamina is represented by a spline surface, and modeled as a Kirchhoff–Love thin shell. Continuum damage mechanics is used to model intralaminar damage, and a new zero-thickness cohesive-interface formulation is introduced to model delamination as well as permitting laminate-level transverse shear compliance. In Part I of this series we focus on the presentation of the modeling framework, validation of the framework using standard Mode I and Mode II delamination tests, and assessment of its suitability for modeling thick laminates. In Part II of this series we focus on the application of the proposed framework to modeling and simulation of damage in composite laminates resulting from impact. The proposed approach has significant accuracy and efficiency advantages over existing methods for modeling impact damage. These stem from the use of IGA-based Kirchhoff–Love shells to represent the individual plies of the composite laminate, while the compliant cohesive interfaces enable transverse shear deformation of the laminate. Kirchhoff–Love shells give a faithful representation of the ply deformation behavior, and, unlike solids or traditional shear-deformable shells, do not suffer from transverse-shear locking in the limit of vanishing thickness. This, in combination with higher-order accurate and smooth representation of the shell midsurface displacement field, allows us to adopt relatively coarse in-plane discretizations without sacrificing solution accuracy. Furthermore, the thin-shell formulation employed does not use rotational degrees of freedom, which gives additional efficiency benefits relative to more standard shell formulations.

[1]  René de Borst,et al.  The incorporation of gradient damage models in shell elements , 2014 .

[2]  Brian Falzon,et al.  A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage , 2008 .

[3]  John R. Rice,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of Cohesive Zone Models of Dynamic Fracture , 2001 .

[4]  Frank A. Leone,et al.  Analysis Methods for Progressive Damage of Composite Structures , 2013 .

[5]  Mgd Marc Geers,et al.  Strain-based transient-gradient damage model for failure analyses , 1998 .

[6]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Isogeometric analysis of continuum damage in rotation-free composite shells , 2015 .

[7]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A large deformation, rotation-free, isogeometric shell , 2011 .

[8]  C. Yang,et al.  Low-Velocity Impact and Damage Process of Composite Laminates , 2002 .

[9]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  Cohesive zone length in numerical simulations of composite delamination , 2008 .

[10]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches , 2010 .

[11]  Fu-Kuo Chang,et al.  A Model for Predicting Damage in Graphite/Epoxy Laminated Composites Resulting from Low-Velocity Point Impact , 1992 .

[12]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Damage modelling of the elementary ply for laminated composites , 1992 .

[13]  P. Camanho,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Mixed-Mode Progressive Delamination in Composite Materials , 2003 .

[14]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  An isogeometric continuum shell element for non-linear analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS , 2012 .

[16]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Finite element analysis of low-velocity impact damage in composite laminated plates , 2006 .

[17]  Alberto Corigliano,et al.  Damage analysis of interlaminar fracture specimens , 1995 .

[18]  Qingda Yang,et al.  Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites , 2005 .

[19]  Gregory J. Tallents,et al.  Temporal resolution of a transient pumping X-ray laser , 2001 .

[20]  Brian Falzon,et al.  Predicting low velocity impact damage and Compression-After-Impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates , 2015 .

[21]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2015, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[22]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[23]  Christophe Bouvet,et al.  Low velocity impact modeling in composite laminates capturing permanent indentation , 2012 .

[24]  Christophe Bouvet,et al.  Failure analysis of CFRP laminates subjected to compression after impact: FE simulation using discrete interface elements , 2013 .

[25]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Fracture length scales in human cortical bone: the necessity of nonlinear fracture models. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[26]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models , 2007 .

[27]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Nonlocal Continuum Damage, Localization Instability and Convergence , 1988 .

[28]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Cohesive Elements for Shells , 2007 .

[29]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Accurate simulation of delamination growth under mixed-mode loading using cohesive elements: Definition of interlaminar strengths and elastic stiffness , 2010 .

[30]  L. J. Sluys,et al.  On gradient-enhanced damage and plasticity models for failure in quasi-brittle and frictional materials , 1995 .

[31]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines , 2012 .

[32]  Christophe Bouvet,et al.  Validation of low velocity impact modelling on different stacking sequences of CFRP laminates and influence of fibre failure , 2013 .

[33]  Anindya Ghoshal,et al.  An interactive geometry modeling and parametric design platform for isogeometric analysis , 2015, Comput. Math. Appl..

[34]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Crack band theory for fracture of concrete , 1983 .

[35]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading , 2006 .

[36]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[37]  O. Allix,et al.  Interlaminar interface modelling for the prediction of delamination , 1992 .

[38]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Nonlocal damage theory , 1987 .

[39]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis: The Reissner-Mindlin shell , 2010 .

[40]  Hyung Yun Choi,et al.  A New Approach toward Understanding Damage Mechanisms and Mechanics of Laminated Composites Due to Low-Velocity Impact: Part I—Experiments , 1991 .

[41]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements , 1998 .

[42]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  An isogeometric solid‐like shell element for nonlinear analysis , 2013 .

[43]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements , 2009 .

[44]  M. Richardson,et al.  Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials , 1996 .

[45]  A. Waas,et al.  Estimating the process zone length of fracture tests used in characterizing composites , 2016 .

[46]  Brian Falzon,et al.  Predicting low-velocity impact damage on a stiffened composite panel , 2010 .

[47]  F. Leone Deformation gradient tensor decomposition for representing matrix cracks in fiber-reinforced materials , 2015 .

[48]  P. Wriggers Finite element algorithms for contact problems , 1995 .

[49]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites , 1995 .

[50]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Failure Criteria for Frp Laminates in Plane Stress , 2013 .

[51]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[52]  Lorenzo Iannucci,et al.  Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: Part I: Development , 2006 .