Are urban material gradients transferable between areas?

Urban areas contain a complex mixture of surface materials resulting in mixed pixels that are challenging to handle with conventional mapping approaches. In particular, for spaceborne hyperspectral images (HSIs) with sufficient spectral resolution to differentiate urban surface materials, the spatial resolution of 30 m (e.g., EnMAP HSIs) makes it difficult to find the spectrally pure pixels required for detailed mapping of urban surface materials. Gradient analysis, which is commonly used in ecology to map natural vegetation consisting of a complex mixture of species, is therefore a promising and practical tool for pattern recognition of urban surface material mixtures. However, the gradients are determined in a data-driven manner, so analysis of their spatial transferability is urgently required. We selected two areas—the Ostbahnhof (Ost) area and the Nymphenburg (Nym) area in Munich, Germany—with simulated EnMAP HSIs and material maps, treating the Ost area as the target area and the Nym area as the well-known area. Three gradient analysis approaches were subsequently proposed for pattern recognition in the Ost area for the cases of (i) sufficient samples collected in the Ost area; (ii) some samples in the Ost area; and (iii) no samples in the Ost area. The Ost samples were used to generate an ordination space in case (i), while the Nym samples were used to create the ordination space to support the pattern recognition of the Ost area in cases (ii) and (iii). The Mantel statistical results show that the sample distributions in the two ordination spaces are similar, with high confidence (the Mantel statistics are 0.995 and 0.990, with a significance of 0.001 in 999 free permutations of the Ost and Nym samples). The results of the partial least square regression models and 10-fold cross-validation show a strong relationship (the calculationvalidation R2 values on the first gradient among the three approaches are 0.898, 0.892; 0.760, 0.743; and 0.860, 0.836, and those on the second gradient are 0.433, 0.351; 0.698, 0.648; and 0.736, 0.646) between the ordination scores of the samples and their reflectance values. The mapping results of the Ost area from three approaches also show similar patterns (e.g., the distribution of vegetation, artificial materials, water, ceremony area) and characteristics of urban structures (the intensity of buildings). Therefore, our findings can help assess the transferability of urban material gradients between similar urban areas.

[1]  S. Schmidtlein,et al.  Mapping of continuous floristic gradients in grasslands using hyperspectral imagery , 2004 .

[2]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library , 2015 .

[3]  Luis Guanter,et al.  EeteS—The EnMAP End-to-End Simulation Tool , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Tobia Lakes,et al.  The urban environmental indicator “Biotope Area Ratio”—An enhanced approach to assess and manage the urban ecosystem services using high resolution remote-sensing , 2012 .

[5]  Birgit Kleinschmit,et al.  Utilizing a PLSR-Based Band-Selection Procedure for Spectral Feature Characterization of Floristic Gradients , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[6]  G. Foody,et al.  Let your maps be fuzzy!—Class probabilities and floristic gradients as alternatives to crisp mapping for remote sensing of vegetation , 2020, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[7]  A. H. Auer,et al.  Correlation of Land Use and Cover with Meteorological Anomalies , 1978 .

[8]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING 1 Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using S , 2022 .

[9]  Hannes Feilhauer,et al.  Combining Isomap ordination and imaging spectroscopy to map continuous floristic gradients in a heterogeneous landscape , 2011 .

[10]  Yan Zhou,et al.  Land cover mapping in urban environments using hyperspectral APEX data: A study case in Baden, Switzerland , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  G. F. Hughes,et al.  On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  S. Frontier Étude de la décroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyse en composantes principales: Comparaison avec le modd́le du bâton brisé , 1976 .

[13]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[14]  Uta Heiden,et al.  Sampling Robustness in Gradient Analysis of Urban Material Mixtures , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Jinfeng Wang,et al.  A review of spatial sampling , 2012 .

[16]  Donald A. Jackson STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[17]  K. Seto,et al.  Global urban land-use trends and climate impacts , 2009 .

[18]  Hermann Kaufmann,et al.  Determination of robust spectral features for identification of urban surface materials in hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2007 .

[19]  R. Green,et al.  An introduction to the NASA Hyperspectral InfraRed Imager (HyspIRI) mission and preparatory activities , 2015 .

[20]  Ruben Van De Kerchove,et al.  Transferability of species distribution models for the detection of an invasive alien bryophyte using imaging spectroscopy data , 2018, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation.

[21]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  Transferability of species distribution models for the detection of an invasive alien bryophyte using imaging spectroscopy data , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[22]  Uta Heiden,et al.  Gradients in urban material composition: A new concept to map cities with spaceborne imaging spectroscopy data , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[23]  Carsten Neumann,et al.  Spatial nature conservation monitoring on the basis of ecological gradients using imaging spectroscopy , 2017 .

[24]  M. Ridd Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities , 1995 .

[25]  Qihao Weng,et al.  Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends , 2012 .

[26]  Angela Lausch,et al.  Mapping the local variability of Natura 2000 habitats with remote sensing , 2014 .

[27]  A. Okujeni,et al.  Imaging Spectroscopy of Urban Environments , 2018, Surveys in Geophysics.

[28]  J. Nieke,et al.  Status: Copernicus Hyperspectral Imaging Mission For The Environment (CHIME) , 2019, IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[29]  Rudolf Richter,et al.  Data Products, Quality and Validation of the DLR Earth Sensing Imaging Spectrometer (DESIS) , 2019, Sensors.

[30]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Spectrometry for urban area remote sensing—Development and analysis of a spectral library from 350 to 2400 nm , 2004 .

[31]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  The EnMAP Spaceborne Imaging Spectroscopy Mission for Earth Observation , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[32]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test , 2001, Oecologia.

[33]  D. Griffith Effective Geographic Sample Size in the Presence of Spatial Autocorrelation , 2005 .

[34]  W. Heldens Use of airborne hyperspectral data and height information to support urban micro-climate characterisation , 2010 .

[35]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  Comparison of airborne hyperspectral data and EO-1 Hyperion for mineral mapping , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[36]  T. Esch,et al.  Urban structure type characterization using hyperspectral remote sensing and height information , 2012 .

[37]  Ben Somers,et al.  Urban tree health assessment using airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR imagery , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.