Comparison of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) and fat‐saturated (chemsat) techniques for background fat intensity suppression in cervical and thoracic MR imaging

The purpose of this study was to compare short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) fast spin‐echo (FSE), and fat‐saturated T2‐weighted FSE sequences in terms of uniformity of fat suppression and lesion conspicuity for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the neck and thorax. STIR FSE and fat‐saturated T2‐weighted FSE images were scored for uniformity of fat suppression (n = 40) and lesion conspicuity (n = 35). Five‐point rank score analyses were utilized by three experienced radiologists. The mean scores of STIR and fat‐saturated FSE techniques for uniformity of fat suppression were 4.3 and 2.3, respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean scores of STIR and fat‐saturated FSE techniques for lesion conspicuity were 4.2 and 3.5, respectively (P < 0.0001). Insufficient fat suppression was prominent in the mandible, supraclavicular region, anterior mediastinum, epipericardial fat, and subdiaphragmatic fat. In addition, fat‐saturated T2‐weighted FSE showed inadvertent water suppression in 25%. The STIR FSE technique was superior to the fat‐saturated FSE technique for cervical and thoracic MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;11:56–60. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. Grevers,et al.  [Short tau inversion recovery fat suppression in T2-weighted turbo spin echo-MRI of malignancies of the mouth and oropharynx]. , 1996, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.

[2]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  MR evaluation of vertebral metastases: T1-weighted, short-inversion-time inversion recovery, fast spin-echo, and inversion-recovery fast spin-echo sequences. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  L. Jäger,et al.  Short-Tau-Inversion-Recovery-Fettsignalunterdrückung bei der T2-gewichteten Turbo-Spin-Echo-MRT von Malignomen in Mundhöhle und Oropharynx , 1996 .

[4]  D. C. Brown,et al.  MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation and fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  J. Debatin,et al.  Fast Spin-Echo Inversion-Recovery Imaging versus Fast T2-Weighted Spin-Echo Imaging in Bone Marrow Abnormalities , 1995, Investigative radiology.

[6]  B Lane,et al.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[7]  H I Goldberg,et al.  STIR MR imaging of the orbit. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  J. E. Stark,et al.  Nontraumatic pediatric musculoskeletal MR imaging: comparison of conventional and fast-spin-echo short inversion time inversion-recovery technique. , 1995, Radiology.

[9]  G M Bydder,et al.  MR Imaging: Clinical Use of the Inversion Recovery Sequence , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  J C Gore,et al.  Signal-to-noise and contrast in fast spin echo (FSE) and inversion recovery FSE imaging. , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  O. Simonetti,et al.  "Black blood" T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  N. Rofsky,et al.  Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  J Listerud,et al.  First principles of fast spin echo. , 1992, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[14]  R. Patten,et al.  Improved fat suppression in STIR MR imaging: selecting inversion time through spectral display. , 1991, Radiology.

[15]  R W Parkey,et al.  Fast short-tau inversion-recovery MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.