Bilateral robot therapy based on haptics and reinforcement learning: Feasibility study of a new concept for treatment of patients after stroke.

OBJECTIVE To carry out a preliminary feasibility study of a new concept of robot therapy for severely impaired patients after stroke. DESIGN A haptic manipulandum connected to a bar that can rotate freely while providing a measure of the rotation angle. The controller combines a bilateral reaching task with the task of balancing the action of the 2 arms. Reinforcement is given to the subject in 2 forms: audio-visual and haptic by means of adaptable force fields. PATIENTS Four highly paretic patients with chronic stroke (Fugl-Meyer score less than 15). METHODS The training cycle consisted of 5 sessions over a period of 2 weeks. Each session (45 min) was divided in blocks of 10 pairs of forward/backward movements. Performance was determined by evaluating the number of successful movements per session, the session-by-session decrease in the assistive field, the mean reaching time, and the mean stopping field. RESULTS All subjects could understand the task, appreciated it and improved their performance during training. The reaching movements became smoother and quicker; balance errors and the magnitude of the resisting field were consistently reduced. CONCLUSION Bilateral robot therapy is a promising technique, provided that it self-adapts to the patient's performance. Formal clinical trials should address this point.

[1]  S. Hesse,et al.  A new mechanical arm trainer to intensify the upper limb rehabilitation of severely affected patients after stroke: design, concept and first case series. , 2007, Europa medicophysica.

[2]  Valentina Squeri,et al.  Robot therapy: the importance of haptic interaction , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[3]  R. Nudo Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  E. Taub,et al.  Neuroplasticity and constraint-induced movement therapy. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[5]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[6]  P. Morasso,et al.  Braccio di Ferro: a new haptic workstation for neuromotor rehabilitation. , 2006, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[7]  Ann M. Stowe,et al.  Extensive Cortical Rewiring after Brain Injury , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[9]  S. Carmichael,et al.  Plasticity of Cortical Projections after Stroke , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[10]  Jeff Biernaskie,et al.  Enriched Rehabilitative Training Promotes Improved Forelimb Motor Function and Enhanced Dendritic Growth after Focal Ischemic Injury , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke , 2000, Neuropharmacology.

[13]  T. Jones,et al.  Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  H. Flor,et al.  Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[15]  D. Dewey,et al.  The temporal locus of transfer of training between hands: an interference study , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.