The Value of a Statistical Life in Transport: Findings from a New Contingent Valuation Study in Sweden

This article presents the results of a contingent valuation study from Sweden aimed at estimating the value of a statistical life (VOSL) in road traffic safety. Data on respondents' own subjective risk was collected by use of visual aids presented in a mail questionnaire. The relationship between willingness-to-pay (WTP) and absolute risk reduction was estimated by using a non-linear, least absolute deviation estimation method. This study generated an income-adjusted VOSL of SEK22.3 million (US$2.6 million). Analysis of WTP's sensitivity to probability variation indicates that in future studies, valuing risk reductions in road traffic, the magnitude of absolute risk and relative risk reductions to consider should be in perceptible range. On addition it should also be possible for respondents to compare the magnitudes of different risk reductions.

[1]  U. Persson,et al.  Scope and scale insensitivities in a contingent valuation study of risk reductions. , 2001, Health policy.

[2]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[3]  J. Graham,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability? , 1999 .

[4]  Anna Norinder,et al.  Valuing the Benefits of Reducing the Risk of Non-Fatal Road Injuries: The Swedish Experience , 1995 .

[5]  W K Viscusi,et al.  Rates of Time Preference and Consumer Valuations of Automobile Safety and Fuel Efficiency , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .

[7]  Joel Huber,et al.  An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks , 1987 .

[8]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The Economics Of Safety And Physical Risk , 1991 .

[9]  Anna Norinder,et al.  Värdet av att minska risken för vägtrafikskador : beräkning av riskvärden för dödliga, genomsnittligt våra och lindriga skador med Contingent Valuation metoden , 2000 .

[10]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator , 1998 .

[11]  M Hammerton,et al.  THE CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE OF ATTITUDES TO PHYSICAL RISK , 1982 .

[12]  M. Jones-Lee.  The Value of Life and Safety: a Survey of Recent Developments , 1985 .

[13]  W. Arthur.  The economics of risks to life. , 1979, The American economic review.

[14]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  THE VALUATION OF RISKS TO LIFE : EVIDENCE FROM THE MARKET FOR AUTOMOBILES , 1990 .

[15]  Paul R. Portney,et al.  The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care , 1994 .

[16]  W. Viscusi,et al.  The value of risks to life and health , 1993 .

[17]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[18]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[19]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The value of life: An economic analysis , 1976 .