Comparison of a multi-leaf collimator with conformal blocks for the delivery of stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy.

Stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy is a practical technique for irradiating irregular lesions in the brain. The shaping of the conformal fields may be achieved using lead alloy blocks, a conventional multi-leaf collimator (MLC) or a mini/micro-MLC. Although the former gives more precise shaping, it is labour intensive. The latter methods are more practical as both mould room and treatment room times are reduced, but the shaping is limited by the finite leaf-width. This study compares treatment plans, in terms of normal tissue doses and tumour coverage, for fields shaped using conformal blocks and a conventional MLC in two series of geometrical shapes and nine patient tumours. For the range of tumour sizes considered (volumes 14-264 cm3, minimum dimension 30 mm, maximum 102 mm), the MLC treats, on average, 14% (range 3-34%) and 17% (range 0-36%) more normal brain tissue than conformal blocks to >50% and >80% of the prescription dose, respectively. The large variability is due to strong dependence on tumour shape and the presence of partial leaf-widths in the MLC fit. It is therefore important to consider both of these effects when deciding whether the MLC is appropriate for a particular target volume.

[1]  R Mohan,et al.  Three dimensional conformal treatment planning with multileaf collimators. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J L Bedford,et al.  A digital method for computing target margins in radiotherapy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[3]  R. Laing,et al.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of irregular targets: a comparison between static conformal beams and non-coplanar arcs. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  J Milan,et al.  The storage and manipulation of radiation dose data in a small digital computer. , 1974, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  Different collimators in convergent beam irradiation of irregularly shaped intracranial target volumes. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  James M. Galvin,et al.  Initiation of multileaf collimator conformal radiation therapy , 1993 .

[7]  J M Galvin,et al.  A comparison of multileaf-collimator and alloy-block field shaping. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  T. Losasso,et al.  Multileaf collimation versus alloy blocks: analysis of geometric accuracy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  L B Marks,et al.  Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or noncoplanar radiation beam bouquets: a possible alternative to radiosurgery. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  H M Kooy,et al.  Comparison of miniature multileaf collimation (MMLC) with circular collimation for stereotactic treatment. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Multileaf collimation versus conventional shielding blocks: a time and motion study of beam shaping in radiotherapy. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  J. Bourland,et al.  Static field conformal stereotactic radiosurgery: physical techniques. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  A P Warrington,et al.  Relocatable frame for stereotactic external beam radiotherapy. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  H. Kubo,et al.  A comparison of arc-based and static mini-multileaf collimator-based radiosurgery treatment plans. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Michael Brada,et al.  A non-invasive, relocatable stereotactic frame for fractionated radiotherapy and multiple imaging. , 1991 .