Reshaping understandings of teaching-learning relationships in undergraduate mathematics: An activity theory analysis of the role and impact of student internships

This article presents an analysis of an intervention intended to address an aspect of undergraduate mathematics education that is frequently described as a situation of deadlock, between second-year undergraduates who are disillusioned with their university mathematics experience, and mathematics departments which describe many students as lacking interest in, and awareness of, the nature of university-level mathematics and how it is learned: whilst departments strive to support such students, the extent to which they can do so is often seen as limited. The SYMBoL project was designed to address this situation in terms of improving dialogue between students and staff through the introduction of undergraduate internships which challenged traditional hierarchical roles and relationships. Using third generation activity theory to analyse the nature and impact of the internship role, we show how the project legitimised the student voice as channelled through that of the interns, created shifts in perceptions of the problem, and began a process of transformational learning about possibilities in undergraduate mathematics teaching. We consider the implications for developing university mathematics teaching within the wider context of tensions across university systems.

[1]  Michael Grove,et al.  Mathematics Support: Support for the specialist mathematician and the more able student , 2006 .

[2]  Melissa Rodd,et al.  An Examination of one Group of Failing Single Honours Students in one University , 2003 .

[3]  Julian Williams,et al.  Measuring students’ transition into university and its association with learning outcomes , 2012 .

[4]  L. Black,et al.  Mathematics students’ aspirations for higher education: class, ethnicity, gender and interpretative repertoire styles , 2008 .

[5]  Mary Thornton,et al.  Analysing teaching–learning interactions in higher education: accounting for structure and agency , 2010 .

[6]  Full Report of Research Activities and Results , 2003 .

[7]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[8]  Yvette Solomon,et al.  Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? , 2007 .

[9]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Making mathematics count : the report of Professor Adrian Smith's inquiry into post-14 mathematics education , 2004 .

[10]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[11]  Gillian Hatch,et al.  Undergraduate Mathematics Experience: Its Significance in Secondary Mathematics Teacher Preparation , 2003 .

[12]  Janette Matthews,et al.  An Activity Theory Analysis of Teaching Goals versus Student Epistemological Positions , 2012 .

[13]  Tony Croft,et al.  Safety in numbers: mathematics support centres and their derivatives as social learning spaces , 2010 .

[14]  Y. Solomon Mathematical Literacy: Developing Identities of Inclusion , 2008 .

[15]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[16]  A. Tsui,et al.  Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership ☆ , 2007 .

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[18]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Can peer assisted learning be effective in undergraduate mathematics? , 2014 .

[19]  Irene Biza,et al.  Communities in university mathematics , 2014 .