Biosynthetic Potentials of Metabolites and Their Hierarchical Organization

A major challenge in systems biology is to understand how complex and highly connected metabolic networks are organized. The structure of these networks is investigated here by identifying sets of metabolites that have a similar biosynthetic potential. We measure the biosynthetic potential of a particular compound by determining all metabolites than can be produced from it and, following a terminology introduced previously, call this set the scope of the compound. To identify groups of compounds with similar scopes, we apply a hierarchical clustering method. We find that compounds within the same cluster often display similar chemical structures and appear in the same metabolic pathway. For each cluster we define a consensus scope by determining a set of metabolites that is most similar to all scopes within the cluster. This allows for a generalization from scopes of single compounds to scopes of a chemical family. We observe that most of the resulting consensus scopes overlap or are fully contained in others, revealing a hierarchical ordering of metabolites according to their biosynthetic potential. Our investigations show that this hierarchy is not only determined by the chemical complexity of the metabolites, but also strongly by their biological function. As a general tendency, metabolites which are necessary for essential cellular processes exhibit a larger biosynthetic potential than those involved in secondary metabolism. A central result is that chemically very similar substances with different biological functions may differ significantly in their biosynthetic potentials. Our studies provide an important step towards understanding fundamental design principles of metabolic networks determined by the structural and functional complexity of metabolites.

[1]  R Heinrich,et al.  Hierarchy of metabolic compounds based on their synthesising capacity. , 2006, Systems biology.

[2]  J. Laszlo,et al.  The occurrence and consequences of deoxyuridine in DNA. , 1984, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[3]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  MetaCyc: a multiorganism database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  R. Firn,et al.  The evolution of secondary metabolism – a unifying model , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[5]  P. Nygaard,et al.  Pyrimidine metabolism in microplasmodia of Physarum polycephalum. , 1978, European journal of biochemistry.

[6]  C. Funk,et al.  Prostaglandins and leukotrienes: advances in eicosanoid biology. , 2001, Science.

[7]  Antje Chang,et al.  BRENDA, enzyme data and metabolic information , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world inside large metabolic networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Metabolic pathways in the post-genome era. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  MetaCyc: a multiorganism database of metabolic pathways and enzymes , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  R. Ladner,et al.  dUTPase and uracil-DNA glycosylase are central modulators of antifolate toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Cancer research.

[12]  D. Segrè,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Tables S1 and S2 References the Effect of Oxygen on Biochemical Networks and the Evolution of Complex Life , 2022 .

[13]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Structural analysis of expanding metabolic networks. , 2004, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[14]  D. Fell,et al.  A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[16]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[17]  Kiyoko F. Aoki-Kinoshita,et al.  From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[19]  Masanori Arita The metabolic world of Escherichia coli is not small. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  B. Palsson,et al.  In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  P. Babbitt,et al.  Evolution of enzyme superfamilies. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[22]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[24]  Oliver Ebenhöh,et al.  Expanding Metabolic Networks: Scopes of Compounds, Robustness, and Evolution , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  E. Pichersky,et al.  Genetics and biochemistry of secondary metabolites in plants: an evolutionary perspective. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[26]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  F. Matthaeus,et al.  Compound clustering and consensus scopes of metabolic networks , 2010 .