Monitoring surface breaking defects with piezoelectric active systems

This paper is concerned with an experimental study and a numerical study of the application of two active techniques to monitor the growth of fatigue cracks and simulated defects in beams using piezoelectric sensors and actuators. The first technique is a transfer function method that consists of exciting the structure with piezoelectric actuators, while recording the electromechanical response of sensors placed close to the defect. Results have shown that the choice of adequate parameters, such as sensor size and its distance to the defect edge, allows the detection of small changes in defect depth. Finite-element simulations were also performed to determine a correlation between sensor response and defect depth. The second method is an impedance technique where a single piezoelectric element is used to excite and to monitor the growth of the defect. This technique was evaluated through experiments where a machined slot of increasing depth was monitored by measuring the electrical admittance of the piezoelectric sensor.

[1]  Grant P. Steven,et al.  VIBRATION-BASED MODEL-DEPENDENT DAMAGE (DELAMINATION) IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH MONITORING FOR COMPOSITE STRUCTURES — A REVIEW , 2000 .

[2]  J. L. Otegui,et al.  A strain gauge technique for monitoring small fatigue cracks in welds , 1991 .

[3]  C. K. Lee.  Theory of laminated piezoelectric plates for the design of distributed sensors/actuators. Part I: Governing equations and reciprocal relationships , 1990 .

[4]  L H Yam,et al.  Identification of complex crack damage for honeycomb sandwich plate using wavelet analysis and neural networks , 2003 .

[5]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge , 2000 .

[6]  Yves Verreman.  Monitoring short fatigue cracks with miniature strain gages , 1994 .

[7]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Detection of disbonding in a repair patch by means of an array of lead zirconate titanate and polyvinylidene fluoride sensors and actuators , 2001 .

[8]  S. T. Jenq,et al.  Characterization of piezo-film sensors for direct vibration and impact measurements , 1995 .

[9]  Craig A. Rogers,et al.  Qualitative impedance-based health monitoring of civil infrastructures , 1998 .

[10]  Andrew D. Dimarogonas,et al.  Vibration of cracked structures: A state of the art review , 1996 .

[11]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Damage Detection in Bonded Repairs using Piezoceramics , 2000 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[13]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  An Integrated Health Monitoring Technique Using Structural Impedance Sensors , 2000 .

[14]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Improving Accessibility of the Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring Method , 2004 .

[15]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  An experimentally validated damage detection theory in smart structures , 1996 .

[16]  O. S. Salawu.  Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[17]  P. Cawley,et al.  A Comparison of the Natural Frequency Changes Produced by Cracks and Slots , 1988 .

[18]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies , 1979 .

[19]  Nicholas J. Carino,et al.  Health monitoring of civil infrastructures , 2003 .

[20]  C. Liang,et al.  An impedance method for dynamic analysis of active material systems , 1994 .

[21]  P. Cawley,et al.  The use of Lamb waves for the long range inspection of large structures , 1996 .