Modelling external bone adaptation using evolutionary structural optimisation

External remodelling is significant in the bone healing process, and it is essential to predict the bone external shape in the design of artificial bone grafts. This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) method for the simulation of bone morphology. A two-dimensional ESO strategy is developed which is capable of finding the modified bone topology beginning with any geometry under any loading conditions. The morphology of bone structure is described by the quantitative bone adaptation theory, which is integrated with the finite element method. The evolutionary topology optimisation process is introduced to find the bone shape. A rectangle, which occupies a larger space than the external shape of the bone structure, is specified as a design domain; the evolutionary process iteratively eliminates and redistributes material throughout the domain to obtain an optimum arrangement of bone materials. The technique has been tested on a wide range of examples. In this paper, the formation of trabecular bone architecture around an implant is studied; as another example, the growth of the coronal section of a vertebral body is predicted. The examples support the assertion that the external shape of bone structure can be successfully predicted by the proposed ESO procedure.

[1]  Besim Ben-Nissan,et al.  Optimal topology design using A global self-organisational approach , 1998 .

[2]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  Some static mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral joint, intact and injured. , 1982, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Y. Xie,et al.  A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization , 1993 .

[5]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[6]  A. Gjelsvik,et al.  Bone remodeling and piezoelectricity. I. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  C. Mattheck,et al.  A new method of structural shape optimization based on biological growth , 1990 .

[8]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Aircraft wing design automation with ESO and GESO , 2002 .

[9]  Claus Mattheck,et al.  Engineering Optimization in Design Processes , 1991 .

[10]  S C Cowin,et al.  The effect of surface roughness on the stress adaptation of trabecular architecture around a cylindrical implant. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  F Eckstein,et al.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads. , 2004, Bone.

[12]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments—Part I: Responses in Flexion, Extension, Lateral Bending, and Torsion , 1979 .

[13]  Gong He,et al.  A study of the effect of non-linearities in the equation of bone remodeling. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  Surface bone remodeling induced by a medullary pin. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  C. Mattheck,et al.  Shape Optimization of Engineering Components by Adaptive Biological Growth , 1991 .

[17]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Claus Mattheck,et al.  The mechanical self-optimisation of trees , 2004 .

[19]  R Huiskes,et al.  A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Timothy P. Harrigan,et al.  Necessary and sufficient conditions for the stability of finite element simulations of bone remodelling , 1993 .

[21]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  C. Whyne,et al.  Parametric finite element analysis of vertebral bodies affected by tumors. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  J. Szivek,et al.  The effect of proximally and fully porous‐coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  S C Cowin,et al.  Chaos in the discrete-time algorithm for bone-density remodeling rate equations. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  D T Davy,et al.  A computational method for stress analysis of adaptive elastic materials with a view toward applications in strain-induced bone remodeling. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  D. Carter,et al.  Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[29]  H Weinans,et al.  A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self-organizational control process. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  E. Hinton,et al.  A review of homogenization and topology optimization I- homogenization theory for media with periodic structure , 1998 .

[32]  Stephen C. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling II: small strain adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[33]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[34]  Gong He,et al.  The application of topology optimization on the quantitative description of the external shape of bone structure. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  C. Mattheck,et al.  DESIGN AND GROWTH RULES FOR BIOLOGICAL STRUCTURES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO ENGINEERING , 1990 .

[36]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[38]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The Anisotropic Hooke's Law for Cancellous Bone and Wood , 1998, Journal Of Elasticity.

[39]  G. Mundy,et al.  Bone remodeling and its disorders , 1999 .

[40]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Bone remodelling simulation: a tool for implant design , 2002 .

[41]  J J Hamilton,et al.  Bone remodeling and structural optimization. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  Mark Burry,et al.  Form finding for complex structures using evolutionary structural optimization method , 2005 .

[43]  Grant P. Steven,et al.  Optimal design of multiple load case structures using an evolutionary procedure , 1994 .

[44]  João Folgado,et al.  Evaluation of osteoporotic bone quality by a computational model for bone remodeling , 2004 .

[45]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments: Influences of Age, Sex, Disc Level, and Degeneration , 1979, Spine.

[46]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Evolutionary Structural Optimization , 1997 .