Control of power sourced from a microbial fuel cell reduces its start-up time and increases bioelectrochemical activity.

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) performance depends on the selective development of an electrogenic biofilm at an electrode. Controlled biofilm enrichment may reduce start-up time and improve subsequent power performance. The anode potential is known to affect start-up and subsequent performance in electrogenic bio-catalytic consortia. Control strategies varying electrical load through gradient based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and transient poised anode potential followed by MPPT are compared to static ohmic loading. Three replicate H-type MFCs were used to investigate start-up strategies: (1) application of an MPPT algorithm preceded by poised-potential at the anode (+0.645 V vs Ag/AgCl); (2) MFC connected to MPPT-only; (3) static external load of 1 kΩ and 500 Ω. Active control showed a significant reduction in start-up time from 42 to 22 days, along with 3.5-fold increase in biocatalytic activity after start-up. Such active control may improve applicability by accelerating start-up and enhancing MFC power and bio-catalytic performance.

[1]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Power overshoot in two-chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC). , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[2]  Qingliang Zhao,et al.  Accelerated start-up of two-chambered microbial fuel cells: Effect of anodic positive poised potential , 2009 .

[3]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  Development of a tubular microbial fuel cell (MFC) employing a membrane electrode assembly cathode , 2009 .

[4]  Yong Chen,et al.  Scalable microbial fuel cell (MFC) stack for continuous real wastewater treatment. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[5]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Biofuel Cells Select for Microbial Consortia That Self-Mediate Electron Transfer , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  F. Harnisch,et al.  Improvement of the anodic bioelectrocatalytic activity of mixed culture biofilms by a simple consecutive electrochemical selection procedure. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[7]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  The influence of psychrophilic and mesophilic start-up temperature on microbial fuel cell system performance , 2011 .

[8]  J. Wimpenny,et al.  Bacterial community structure, compartmentalization and activity in a microbial fuel cell , 2006, Journal of applied microbiology.

[9]  Jung Rae Kim,et al.  Automatic control of load increases power and efficiency in a microbial fuel cell , 2011 .

[10]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Importance of temperature and anodic medium composition on microbial fuel cell (MFC) performance , 2008, Biotechnology Letters.

[11]  Benjamin Erable,et al.  Sampling natural biofilms: a new route to build efficient microbial anodes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Keith Scott,et al.  Electricity generation from the treatment of wastewater with a hybrid up‐flow microbial fuel cell , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Adaptation to high current using low external resistances eliminates power overshoot in microbial fuel cells. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[14]  Han-Qing Yu,et al.  Manipulating the hydrogen production from acetate in a microbial electrolysis cell–microbial fuel cell-coupled system , 2009 .

[15]  Jae Kyung Jang,et al.  Continuous determination of biochemical oxygen demand using microbial fuel cell type biosensor. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[16]  Ioannis Ieropoulos,et al.  The overshoot phenomenon as a function of internal resistance in microbial fuel cells. , 2011, Bioelectrochemistry.

[17]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Evaluation of procedures to acclimate a microbial fuel cell for electricity production , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  K. Xiao,et al.  A new method for water desalination using microbial desalination cells. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Stefano Freguia,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Brian H. Davison,et al.  Integrating engineering design improvements with exoelectrogen enrichment process to increase power output from microbial fuel cells , 2009 .

[21]  I Karube,et al.  A mediator-type biosensor as a new approach to biochemical oxygen demand estimation. , 2000, The Analyst.

[22]  W. Verstraete,et al.  High shear enrichment improves the performance of the anodophilic microbial consortium in a microbial fuel cell , 2008, Microbial biotechnology.

[23]  G. Premier,et al.  Sustainable wastewater treatment: how might microbial fuel cells contribute. , 2010, Biotechnology Advances.

[24]  Alan J Guwy,et al.  Modular tubular microbial fuel cells for energy recovery during sucrose wastewater treatment at low organic loading rate. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Bruce E. Logan,et al.  Analysis of polarization methods for elimination of power overshoot in microbial fuel cells , 2011 .

[26]  In S. Kim,et al.  Effect of hydrodymamic force and prolonged oxygen exposure on the performance of anodic biofilm in microbial electrolysis cells , 2010 .

[27]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[28]  Leonard M Tender,et al.  Effect of electrode potential on electrode-reducing microbiota. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Boris Tartakovsky,et al.  Hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell with nickel-based gas diffusion cathodes , 2010 .

[30]  Ralf Cord-Ruwisch,et al.  Affinity of microbial fuel cell biofilm for the anodic potential. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.