M pathway and areas 44 and 45 are involved in stereoscopic recognition based on binocular disparity.

We characterized the visual pathways involved in the stereoscopic recognition of the random dot stereogram based on the binocular disparity employing a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The V2, V3, V4, V5, intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the superior temporal sulcus (STS) were significantly activated during the binocular stereopsis, but the inferotemporal gyrus (ITG) was not activated. Thus a human M pathway may be part of a network involved in the stereoscopic processing based on the binocular disparity. It is intriguing that areas 44 (Broca's area) and 45 in the left hemisphere were also active during the binocular stereopsis. However, it was reported that these regions were inactive during the monocular stereopsis. To separate the specific responses directly caused by the stereoscopic recognition process from the nonspecific ones caused by the memory load or the intention, we designed a novel frequency labeled tasks (FLT) sequence. The functional MRI using the FLT indicated that the activation of areas 44 and 45 is correlated with the stereoscopic recognition based on the binocular disparity but not with the intention artifacts, suggesting that areas 44 and 45 play an essential role in the binocular disparity.

[1]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity , 1988 .

[2]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Depth perception and location of brain lesions , 1975, Journal of Neurology.

[3]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions , 1987 .

[4]  P. Fox,et al.  Intersubject variability of functional areas in the human visual cortex , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Localization and lateralization of stereoscopic processing in the human brain. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[6]  Toshio Inui,et al.  Neural substrates for depth perception of the Necker cube; a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  T. Poggio,et al.  The analysis of stereopsis. , 1984, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Human Cortical Regions Involved in Extracting Depth from Motion , 1999, Neuron.

[9]  S. Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortical connections , 1988, Nature.

[10]  M. Ptito,et al.  Loss of stereopsis following lesions of cortical areas 17–18 in the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[12]  E. Phelps,et al.  "Willed action": a functional MRI study of the human prefrontal cortex during a sensorimotor task. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Structural and Functional Analyses of Human Cerebral Cortex Using a Surface-Based Atlas , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Julesz.  Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[15]  B. Gulyás,et al.  Binocular disparity discrimination in human cerebral cortex: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[17]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  A model for intradendritic computation of binocular disparity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  T B Rothstein,et al.  Defective stereopsis in lesions of the parietal lobe. , 1972, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  T Nakada,et al.  Perceptual processing of stereopsis in humans: high-field (3.0-tesla) functional MRI study. , 1999, Neurology.

[20]  A. Benton,et al.  Stereoscopic vision in patients with unilateral cerebral disease , 1970, Neurology.

[21]  F. Krause,et al.  Binocular matching in monkey visual cortex: Single cell responses to correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random dot stereograms , 1993, Neuroscience.

[22]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.