Soft-tissues Image Processing: Comparison of Traditional Segmentation Methods with 2D active Contour Methods

Soft-tissues Image Processing: Comparison of Traditional Segmentation Methods with 2D active Contour Methods The paper deals with modern methods of image processing, especially image segmentation, classification and evaluation of parameters. It focuses primarily on processing medical images of soft tissues obtained by magnetic resonance tomography (MR). It is easy to describe edges of the sought objects using segmented images. The edges found can be useful for further processing of monitored object such as calculating the perimeter, surface and volume evaluation or even three-dimensional shape reconstruction. The proposed solutions can be used for the classification of healthy/unhealthy tissues in MR or other imaging. Application examples of the proposed segmentation methods are shown. Research in the area of image segmentation focuses on methods based on solving partial differential equations. This is a modern method for image processing, often called the active contour method. It is of great advantage in the segmentation of real images degraded by noise with fuzzy edges and transitions between objects. In the paper, results of the segmentation of medical images by the active contour method are compared with results of the segmentation by other existing methods. Experimental applications which demonstrate the very good properties of the active contour method are given.

[1]  J. Boone,et al.  Comprar Essential Physics Of Medical Imaging, International Edition | Jerrold T. Bushberg | 9781451118100 | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2012 .

[2]  Khalid M. Amin,et al.  Automatic liver tumor segmentation from CT scans with knowledge-based constraints , 2010, 2010 5th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference.

[3]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[4]  Jiří Přibil,et al.  Measurement and Imaging of Planar Electromagnetic Phantoms Based on NMR Imaging Methods , 2010 .

[5]  Karel Bartusek,et al.  Correction of artifacts in diffusion-weighted MR images , 2011, 2011 34th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP).

[6]  Pierre Kornprobst,et al.  Mathematical problems in image processing - partial differential equations and the calculus of variations , 2010, Applied mathematical sciences.

[7]  Bart De Dobbelaer,et al.  Semi-automatic level set segmentation of liver tumors combining a spiral-scanning technique with supervised fuzzy pixel classification , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Mika Pollari,et al.  Semi-automatic liver tumor segmentation with hidden Markov measure field model and non-parametric distribution estimation , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  A. Yezzi,et al.  On the relationship between parametric and geometric active contours , 2000, Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154).

[10]  S. Osher,et al.  Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations , 1988 .

[11]  H. Rabbani Statistical Modeling of Low SNR Magnetic Resonance Images in Wavelet Domain Using Laplacian Prior and Two-Sided Rayleigh Noise for Visual Quality Improvement , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[12]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[13]  E. Peli Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  W. Clem Karl,et al.  A Real-Time Algorithm for the Approximation of Level-Set-Based Curve Evolution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Karel Bartusek,et al.  Processing of MR Slices of Human Liver for Volumetry , 2010 .

[16]  B. Pogue,et al.  Automated region detection based on the contrast-to-noise ratio in near-infrared tomography. , 2004, Applied optics.

[17]  Bart De Dobbelaer,et al.  Segmentation of Liver Metastases Using a Level Set Method with Spiral-Scanning Technique and Supervised Fuzzy Pixel Classification , 2008, The MIDAS Journal.

[18]  Chunming Li,et al.  Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[19]  Allen R. Tannenbaum,et al.  Localizing Region-Based Active Contours , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  S. Ong,et al.  Integrating FCM and Level Sets for Liver Tumor Segmentation , 2009 .

[21]  Christin Wirth The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  Ondrej Liberda,et al.  Data processing in studying the temporomandibular joint, using MR imaging and sonographic techniques , 2009, 2009 16th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[23]  J. Jan Medical Image Processing, Reconstruction and Restoration: Concepts and Methods , 2005 .

[24]  Ondrej Liberda,et al.  Creating a 3D model of the temporomandibular joint disc on the basis of segmented MRI slices , 2011, 2011 34th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP).

[26]  Jean Stawiaski,et al.  Interactive Liver Tumor Segmentation Using Graph-cuts and Watershed , 2008, The MIDAS Journal.

[27]  Albert A. Michelson,et al.  Studies in Optics , 1995 .

[28]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Tae-Woong Chung,et al.  Automatic Boundary Tumor Segmentation of a Liver , 2005, ICCSA.

[30]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  A Multiphase Level Set Framework for Image Segmentation Using the Mumford and Shah Model , 2002, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .